[Heb-NACO] "Nidpas me-ḥadash be-tosefet...": 245/250/500?

[Kuperman, Aaron]

The Hebrew phrase, “נדפס מחדש ...” is not integral to the title, but rather is supplementary to it.  It serves to identify the expression or manifestation, but not the work itself.   If you deleted the phrase, the title would be perfectly understandable and its meaning unaffected. Typically it is in small print.  One would not refer to the work by the phrase in requesting it from a book store or a reference librarian.

Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section.
This is not an official communication from my employer

From: heb-naco-bounces at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Heidi G Lerner
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] "Nidpas me-ḥadash be-tosefet...": 245/250/500?

I think that the wording of RDA 2.5.2.6 gives us the instruction on how to handle this situation:

Designation of Edition Integral to Title Proper, Etc.
If:
a designation of edition is an integral part of the title proper, other title information, or statement of responsibility
or
the designation is grammatically linked to any of these elements
then:
record the designation of edition as part of the element to which it is integrated or linked. Do not record it again as a designation of edition.



EXAMPLE
The compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary
Designation of edition integral to title proper. No designation of edition recorded

Tenth anniversary edition of Economic justice for all
Designation of edition integral to title proper. No designation of edition recorded

Bullarum diplomatum et privilegiorum sanctorum Romanorum pontificum Taurinensis editio
Designation of edition integral to title proper. No designation of edition recorded

a revised and augmented edition of the Glossary of biotechnology and genetic engineering
Designation of edition integral to other title information. No designation of edition recorded

édition française revue par Germaine Meyer-Noire
Designation of edition integral to statement of responsibility. No designation of edition recorded

So it seems that it would go in a 245 field.

Does anyone have other thoughts?

Thanks, Hweidi


________________________________
From: "Jasmin Nof" <jnof at upenn.edu<mailto:jnof at upenn.edu>>
To: "Hebrew Name Authority Funnel" <heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu<mailto:heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu>>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:05:18 AM
Subject: [Heb-NACO] "Nidpas me-ḥadash be-tosefet...": 245/250/500?

When is such a statement as the above, in my case "nidpas me-ḥadash
be-tosefet merubah ʻal ha-rishonim, mugahim mi-kol ha-ṭaʻuyot she-naflu
ba-defusim ha-ḳodmim...", placed in the 245$b, when in the 250, and when
in the 500?  Or in some cases, split between the 250 Nidpas me-ḥadash
and 500 Be-tosefet ...?   I've seen various practices and don't know
what the determining factor is; or is there not one -- aka, "cataloger's
judgement"?

Thanks, Jasmin

--
Jasmin Nof
Hebraica Cataloging Librarian
University of Pennsylvania
Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
3420 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206
T. 215-746-6397
F. 215-573-9610
jnof at upenn.edu<mailto:jnof at upenn.edu>

_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu>
https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco


--
Heidi G. Lerner
Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
Metadata Development Unit
Stanford University Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu<mailto:lerner at stanford.edu>
ph: 650-725-9953
fax: 650-725-1120

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20140828/77ff7789/attachment.html>