[Heb-NACO] [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)

Robert M. TALBOTT rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu
Wed Nov 18 12:27:02 EST 2015


For what it's worth, as I understand it, parentheses are for works and
$f is for expressions.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Heidi G Lerner <lerner at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Yes!
>
>
> Heidi G. Lerner
>
> Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
>
> Metadata Dept.
>
> Stanford University Libraries
>
> Stanford, CA 94305-6004
>
> ph: 650-725-9953
>
> fax: 650-725-1120
>
> e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Jasmin
> Shinohara <jshino at pobox.upenn.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:28 PM
> To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
> Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
>
> See Stephen Hearn's email from yesterday (3:02PM), where he says:
>
> "Yes, it would be more in keeping with MARC21 to add a date qualifier to
> subfield $p in parentheses without $f when it distinguishes the work being
> named.  In the MARC21 Bib Format under Heading Fields, X30, the text
> distinguishes between "date of publication" added to a uniform title field
> in subfield $f and "Date added parenthetically to distinguish between
> identical uniform titles" without separate subfield coding."
>
> As I understand it, when added in parenthesis the date is needed as part of
> the access point for differentiation; in $f it's just added for the sake of
> extra information.
>
> Heidi, do I understand that correctly?
>
> On 11/16/2015 1:56 PM, Judith Zupnick wrote:
>
> What is the difference whether one records the date in subfield f or in
> parentheses?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Heidi G Lerner
> <lerner at stanford.edu>
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:44 AM
> To: HebNACO
> Subject: [Heb-NACO] Fwd: [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
>
> FYI
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "Adam L. Schiff" <aschiff at UW.EDU>
> Date: November 13, 2015 at 4:03:49 PM EST
> To: <PCCLIST at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
> Subject: [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <PCCLIST at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
>
> I did a keyword search today in the OCLC authority file for titles
> containing the words works, selections, and 2015.  There are records like
> these:
>
>
>
> Ashlag, Yehudah. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>
> Dōgen, ǂd 1200-1253. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>
> Jano, Jack. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>
> Kook, Abraham Isaac, ǂd 1865-1935. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>
> Lovecraft, H. P. ǂq (Howard Phillips), ǂd 1890-1937. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections
> (2015)
>
>
>
> But many, many more records like these:
>
>
>
> Austen, Jane, ǂd 1775-1817. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
> Benjamin, Walter, ǂd 1892-1940. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
> Chopin, Kate, ǂd 1850-1904. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
> Jackson, Shirley, ǂd 1916-1965. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
> Lawrence, D. H. ǂq (David Herbert), ǂd 1885-1930. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections.
> ǂf 2015
>
> Madison, James, ǂd 1751-1836. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
> Man Ray, ǂd 1890-1976. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
> Noonan, Peggy, ǂd 1950- ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>
>
>
> And more complicated ones such as:
>
>
>
> Piglia, Ricardo. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015 ǂs (Editorial Universidad
> de Talca)
>
> Piglia, Ricardo. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015 ǂs (Eterna Cadencia
> Editora)
>
>
>
> Since Works. Selections is considered a work access point and not an
> expression point, when breaking a conflict with another collection that has
> the same collective title, the qualifier(s) should be put in paretheses and
> no subfielding is used in such a situation (work qualifiers are never
> preceded by subfield coding).
>
>
>
> It doesn’t look like many NACO catalogers understand this from the disparity
> between the number of correctly coded records and the incorrectly coded
> ones.   Do we need somehow to do a better job of teaching this?  Do we need
> a project to clean up all the incorrectly coded Works. Selections RDA access
> points?  Or does it not matter?
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> Adam L. Schiff
>
> Principal Cataloger
>
> University of Washington Libraries
>
> Box 352900
>
> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
>
> aschiff at uw.edu
>
> (206) 543-8409
>
> (206) 685-8782 fax
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>



-- 
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ


More information about the Heb-naco mailing list