[Heb-NACO] romanization question

[Jasmin Shinohara]

(I think you mean טחב. :-) )

On 7/27/2015 2:18 PM, Neil Manel Frau-Cortes wrote:
>
> I agree with Barry that this is ki + metahaveh (which appears as a 
> single word on ES, and is linked to the root טחה
>
> However, I think the discussion is: should we consider כמטחוה-as a 
> single preposition? “A distance of about...”   As such it can combine 
> with קשת, תוחה, etc, and wouldn’t be unlike compound prepositions such 
> as לפני, in which the etymology as separate words is not really relevant.
>
> **
>
> *Neil M. Frau-Cortes, Ph.D.*
>
> Judaica, Hebraica and Metadata Cataloger
>
> McKeldin Library
>
> University of Maryland
> College Park, MD 20742
> Phone (301) 405-9337
>
> nfrau at umd.edu
>
> *From:*Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+nfrau=umd.edu at lists.osu.edu] 
> *On Behalf Of *Barry Walfish
> *Sent:* Monday, July 27, 2015 2:07 PM
> *To:* Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
> *Subject:* Re: [Heb-NACO] romanization question
>
> I don’t see that. Question is, is the mem part of the word, as 
> metahaveh, or a preposition: min tahaveh.
>
> Even Shoshan lists it under Metahaveh, unless it changed this in the 
> newer edtions (mine is from 1969). It’s a very strange word, but it 
> seems like the mem is part of the construction.
>
> Barry
>
> *From:*Heb-naco 
> [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish=utoronto.ca at lists.osu.edu] *On 
> Behalf Of *Yossi Galron
> *Sent:* July 27, 2015 1:49 PM
> *To:* Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
> *Subject:* Re: [Heb-NACO] romanization question
>
> I would disagree:
>
> The correct form would be (IMO) Kime-tahave as in כמטחווי-קשת
>
> See Genesis 21:16 and ES, vol. 2, page 641
>
>
> Joseph (Yossi) Galron-Goldschläger
> E-Mail: galron.1 at osu.edu <mailto:galron.1 at osu.edu> or 
> jgalron at gmail.com <mailto:jgalron at gmail.com>
> Tel.: (614) 292-3362,  Fax: (614)292-1918
> Lexicon of Modern Hebrew Literature: http://go.osu.edu/hebrewlit 
> <http://go.osu.edu/hebrewlit>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Barry Walfish 
> <barry.walfish at utoronto.ca <mailto:barry.walfish at utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
> I would go with the first option, following ES.
>
> Barry
>
> *From:*Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish 
> <mailto:heb-naco-bounces%2Bbarry.walfish>=utoronto.ca at lists.osu.edu 
> <mailto:utoronto.ca at lists.osu.edu>] *On Behalf Of *Heidi G Lerner
> *Sent:* July 27, 2015 1:08 PM
> *To:* Hebrew Name Authority Funnel 
> (heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu 
> <mailto:heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu>)
> *Subject:* [Heb-NACO] romanization question
>
> I would like some help on providing the correct romanization for
>
> כמטחווי
>
> Would it be:
>
> ki-meṭaḥaṿe
>
> or
>
> ki-mṭaḥaṿe
>
> Alkalay does not show a "sheva" under the Even-Shoshan does.
>
> Thanks, Heidi
>
> -- 
>
> Heidi G. Lerner
> Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
> Metadata Development Unit
> Stanford University Libraries
> Stanford, CA 94305-6004
> e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu <mailto:lerner at stanford.edu>
> ph: 650-725-9953 <tel:650-725-9953>
> fax: 650-725-1120 <tel:650-725-1120>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu <mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20150727/bfb454a1/attachment-0001.html>