[Heb-NACO] relationship designator for posek?

[Kuperman, Aaron]

1. But in any event, the person is neither the creator nor contributor, and a 700 heading would not be correct.

2. When relationship indicators are created for 600/610/630 headings, we probably want one for a work the claims to have been influence by someone or something else.  This is not a uniquely “Jewish” or “Hebrew” issue.  For Islamic law, there are specific “schools” that are added as headings, and for general law we have a heading in the pattern of “Law--[country or religion] influences” reflect the typical sorts of influences in most legal systems.

3. At present, there is always the option of a 600/610/630 heading with the subdivision $x Influence.

4. There is no problem in transcribing what is on the title page either in the 245 field, or as a quoted note in the 500 field.

Aaron K.

Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section.
This is not an official communication from my employer


From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+akup=loc.gov at lists.osu.edu] On Behalf Of Taub, Aaron
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:07 PM
To: 'Hebrew Name Authority Funnel'
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] relationship designator for posek?

Dear Heidi, Aaron K., and All,

The scenario that Ela is describing is not really a commentary on a person’s particular work and arguably does not merit a subject heading.  Rather, the posek has influenced the writing of the author to such a degree that the posek is featured prominently on the title page.

Thanks,
Aaron T.

From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu] On Behalf Of Heidi G Lerner
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 12:44 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] relationship designator for posek?

Historically I believe that catalogers have usually treated posḳim as creators [author or compiler?]. If we follow that practice then it seems that the resource being cataloged could be treated as a commentary on the legal adjudications of the poseḳ.

In this case we can  use a formal relationship designator such as found in RDA J.2.1 in a MARC21 700 field such as "Based on (work):[author].|t[preferred title]" or M.2.2 "Commentary on (work): [author]. [preferred title]"

I am eager to hear thoughts from other members of our cataloging community.

Thanks, Heidi

________________________________
From: "Ela Pelish" <epel at loc.gov<mailto:epel at loc.gov>>
To: "heb-naco at lists.acs.ohio-state.edu<mailto:heb-naco at lists.acs.ohio-state.edu>" <heb-naco at lists.acs.ohio-state.edu<mailto:heb-naco at lists.acs.ohio-state.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 7:45:17 AM
Subject: [Heb-NACO] relationship designator for posek?

Hello All,

On numerous rabbinic books, it is stated explicity (and prominently) that the work is based on the pesak/writings (title often unspecified) of a particular posek.  But so far, there is no relationship designator available.  I found on Wikipedia two concise descriptions: “Jewish law arbiter” and “Jewish law adjudicator.”

We’ve discussed this issue in the Israel and Judaica section here at LC.  The question is not only which term is better but also should we be giving access to the posek without the title of the specific work he authored.  Would having such a relationship designator be helpful?  Thank you in advance for your feedback.

Ela Pelish
Israel and Judaica section
Library of Congress



_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco


--
Heidi G. Lerner
Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
Metadata Development Unit
Stanford University Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu<mailto:lerner at stanford.edu>
ph: 650-725-9953
fax: 650-725-1120
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20150702/52282b82/attachment-0001.html>