[Heb-NACO] Choueka

[Rose Shoshanah Seidman]

Hi Neil and everyone :

Your question reminded me of another instance when the transcription doesn’t make sense – see authority record 8232817 for Daniyel Tevito or ARN 5925102 for Mosheh P. Tu’itu (better than Tevito) .  Daniel Touitou is known in France and no one would consider his name to be Tevito or Tvito where Touitou is a very common Sephardic name.  Because of our Hebrew cataloging rules he was established as Tevito (!!!) and Mosheh Touitou was established as Tuitu.

I vote for common sense

Shoshanah

Shoshanah Seidman
Faculty Liaison, Program for Jewish Studies,
Northwestern University Library
847-467-2914



From: heb-naco-bounces+sseidman=northwestern.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+sseidman=northwestern.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Manuel Frau-Cortes
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 9:26 AM
To: heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
Subject: [Heb-NACO] Choueka

Hi all,

I am having problems transcribing a 245. It’s about R. Aharon Choueka (1897-1978). In Hebrew it is written שויקה. The common pronunciation of the name has always been Shoo-eh-kah, and therefore the vav and the yud are matres lectionis, not semi-consonants in any way. Yet I am finding bibs with transcriptions like Shuyekah, which probably are correct according to the rule, but make no sense scientifically speaking, not to mention the fact that they are of no use to most patrons.

Your thoughts? Can common sense and known pronunciation bend the rules?

Of course, I also found records with Shavikah, Shvikah, and Shvekah, but those are just mistakes.


Shabbat shalom,


Neil M. Frau-Cortes
Judaica, Hebraica and Metadata Cataloger
McKeldin Library
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Phone (301) 405-9337
nfrau at umd.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20140324/95daca10/attachment.html>