[Heb-NACO] parallel titles

[Robert M. TALBOTT]

Thank you, Joan.

B


On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Joan Biella <jbiella2632 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Bob's question is not answered in RDA, as far as I know, at least as far
> as Heidi and I knew when we conducted the RDA e-forum earlier this year.
> Here's what we said:
>
> 245/246—*Parallel title proper* is a Core element for libraries that
> adhere to LC or PCC policy. (It is not necessarily a core element for
> libraries that do not follow LC-PCC guidelines.)  Under AACR2, we
> transcribed parallel titles appearing in the same source as the title
> proper in the 245, following an equals sign (=).  Under RDA we record any
> title/all titles matching the definition in the 245, regardless of where
> they appear in the resource.  In this example, the “title proper in
> another language or script” appears on the t.p. verso.  So it must appear
> in the 245.  It’s optional to provide a 246 which identifies where it was
> found in the resource. The location is provided either by the first and
> second indicators or the use of delimiter “i”. Please review the guidelines
> for variant title access in LC-PCC PS 2.3.6.3 and the MARC21 Bibliographic
> Format.
>
>
>
> *Parallel other title information* is not a Core element.  The 245 may be
> formulated as:
>
>
>
> ‡a Title proper = ‡b Parallel title : other title information / ‡c
> statement of responsibility.
>
> or as
>
> ‡a Title proper : ‡b other title information = Parallel title : parallel
> other title information / ‡c statement of responsibility.
>
>
>
> Additionally or alternatively, if there is parallel other title
> information, it may be included in the 246:
>
>
>
> $a Parallel title : ‡b parallel other title information
>
>
>
> Giving the parallel other title information in both the 245 and the 246 is
> more trouble than it’s worth, the judgment of many.
>
>
>
> P.S. Of course the choice and order of recorded information should be the
> same in both the parallel fields.
>
>
>
>
>
>  [Heb-NACO] A question re. the draft of Hebraica Cataloging
> Inbox
> x
> Robert M. TALBOTT via
> <http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1311182&ctx=mail>
>  lists.service.ohio-state.edu
> Jun 23 (3 days ago)
>
>
> to Hebrew
> Good people of the Heb-NACO-sphere:
>
> As I've been reviewing the draft of the HC RDA, something keeps popping up
> with regard to the structure of 245's with parallel titles, to wit:
>
> A. p.43  Emek ha-shaveh = $b Emek hashave : mahzor shirim
>
> structurally, that's 245##$a [romanized] = $b [parallel $a] : [romanized
> sub title]
>
> I've seen this construction before and it has pleased me not one bit, and
> I doubt that I'm alone.
>
> A formulation that I like much better because it more closely approximates
> my algebraic approach to cataloging:
>
> B 245## Emek ha-shaveh : $b mahzor shirim = Emek hashave*
>
> The Bob-pleasing structure is
>
> 245## [$a romanized] : [$b rom. sub.] = [parallel of $a]*
>
> My questions:
>
> 1) Is structure A endorsed anywhere in RDA explicitly?
>
> 2) Is the choice of structures a matter of cataloger's judgement?
>
> *I'll have you know that I would shamelessly include the parallel
> sub-title as well.
>
> B
> --
>
> Bob Talbott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
> https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
>


-- 

Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720


We're happy as fish,
as gorgeous as geese,
and wonderfully clean in the morning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20140630/03a9ba94/attachment.html>