[Heb-NACO] "Nidpas me-ḥadash be-tosefet...": 245/250/500?

[Kuperman, Aaron]

1.  This clearly indicates a new expression. The phrase isn't part of the title.

2. It is too bulky to put in the 250 field.  While it is a de facto edition statement, it doesn't resemble the structure of a western edition statement, suggesting it could go in a 500 quoted note (which depending on local practice and cataloger judgment might obviate the need for Romanization).

Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section. 
This is not an official communication from my employer

-----Original Message-----
From: heb-naco-bounces+akup=loc.gov at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+akup=loc.gov at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Jasmin Nof
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:05 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: [Heb-NACO] "Nidpas me-ḥadash be-tosefet...": 245/250/500?

When is such a statement as the above, in my case "nidpas me-ḥadash be-tosefet merubah ʻal ha-rishonim, mugahim mi-kol ha-ṭaʻuyot she-naflu ba-defusim ha-ḳodmim...", placed in the 245$b, when in the 250, and when in the 500?  Or in some cases, split between the 250 Nidpas me-ḥadash 
and 500 Be-tosefet ...?   I've seen various practices and don't know 
what the determining factor is; or is there not one -- aka, "cataloger's judgement"?

Thanks, Jasmin

--
Jasmin Nof
Hebraica Cataloging Librarian
University of Pennsylvania
Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
3420 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206
T. 215-746-6397
F. 215-573-9610
jnof at upenn.edu

_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco