[Heb-NACO] Li-fene ha-nesi'ah

[Robert Talbott]

I'll let someone else field the Li-fene question, but as far as Pitedah 
is concerned:  there's a sheva there because tet and dalet are both 
dentals, per the practice noted on p. 11 of Maher in the case of 
"mitpalelim."  I suppose that would be a sheva na'.  The sheva is our 
friend, and it's here to help.

My two cents, I defer to Those Who Know, etc. etc.

Bob

On 9/5/2012 9:26 AM, Barry Walfish wrote:
>
> Dear Safranim,
>
> I have two questions about the romanization in the record for this 
> title by Rivka Miriam and Meir Appelfeld (Raananah Even Hoshen, 2011). 
> LCN 2011483420.
>
> First, li-fene. Why not lifne? It seems to me that this is a word of 
> which the preposition is an integral part.
>
> Second, the series Pitedah. Why not Pitdah. There is no dagesh in the 
> tet and the sheva is nah.
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Barry
>
> Barry Dov Walfish, Ph.D.
>
> Judaica and Theology Specialist
>
> Collection Development Department and
>
> Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library
>
> University of Toronto Library
>
> 130 St. George St.
>
> Toronto, ON
>
> Canada M5S 1A5
>
> phone: 416-946-3176 or 416-978-4319
>
> fax: 416-978-1667 or 416-946-0635
>
> e-mail: barry.walfish at utoronto.ca
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
> https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20120905/21c9c666/attachment.html>