[Heb-NACO] period of activity and the 046

[Jasmin Nof]

potential question of ignorance, but these are not birth/death dates and 
there is no conflict for the name Yitshak Elisha'; why would you need to 
add them to the 1xx? as for the 046, i don't think such dates would be 
coded; my guess is that they'd be given in the 670 only.

jasmin

On 10/22/2012 1:56 PM, Robert Talbott wrote:
> Folks:
>
> Yet another open letter to Joan and Heidi:
>
> I'm having a difficult time coding the 046 for an "active" date. The 
> person in question, ha-tsa'ir Yitshak Elisha', S.t, not only had his 
> named stamped on the cover of the book in hand, but also felt obliged 
> to note the date he acquired the in-hand manuscript: 604 [1843 or 1844].
>
> So, the rules say to prefer a solid date to a century date.  Odd, but 
> I'm okay with that.  Thus his 1xx $d will read $d active 1843 or 1844, 
> and per the rules, we like the form [1843, 1844]$2edtf for the 046. 
> But how do I code this in the 046? $f/$g seems to be devoted 
> exclusively to birth and death, while $s/$t apparently cover the 
> creation/dissolution of corporate entities.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bob
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
> https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco