MCLC: story behind Xi Jinping's disappearance

[Denton, Kirk]

MCLC LIST
From: kirk (denton.2 at osu.edu)
Subject: story behind Xi Jinping's disappearance
***********************************************************

Source: Washington Post (11/1/12):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/11/01/the-secret-sto
ry-behind-xi-jinpings-disappearance-finally-revealed/

The secret story behind Xi Jinping’s disappearance, finally revealed?
Posted by Max Fisher

In September, Chinese vice president and the man about to assume a 10-year
term as China’s leader, Xi Jinping, disappeared mysteriously for two
weeks. He went unseen, unheard, and undiscussed by official Chinese media
at a time when the world was (and still is) anxiously watching China’s
leadership transition. It was weird, and a little bit scary, and we still
don’t really know what happened.

Now, longtime China-based journalist Mark Kitto says he knows “the true
story.” He says his source is “someone with access to the top level of the
Chinese governing apparatus.”

According to Kitto’s story, Xi was hit in the back with a chair hurled
during a contentious meeting of “the red second generation.” These
meetings of the Communist Party old guard’s elite and now-adult children,
which includes Xi, come with a lot of baggage. Old rivalries, petty
squabbles, and apparently fights that include flying chairs. Here’s Kitto
<http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/xi-jinping-disappearence-truth/>:

<<The meeting turned violent. They went at it hammer and sickle. Xi
Jinping tried to calm them down. He put himself physically in the
crossfire and unwittingly into the path of a chair as it was thrown across
the room. It hit him in the back, injuring him. Hence the absence, and the
silence, and the rumours.>>

It’s a plausible story, but given its single anonymous source, probably
best taken as an interesting but not yet verified account.

Kitto argues that this was a lost public-relations opportunity for the
party, which could have used the story to point out that Xi has the
“courage to quell the squabbling about personal histories and vested
interests.” It’s a common perspective among Western “China bulls” that
China’s government is actually better than it seems and that its failures
often come down to public relations. There’s some truth to this, but in
this case it’s hard to see how rich, old elites fighting in secret
meetings would boost popular attitudes toward the party.