[Heb-NACO] Nokhehim? Nokhhim?
Heidi G Lerner
lerner at stanford.edu
Tue Apr 18 10:56:28 EDT 2017
We have historically provided a simple rule for romanizing Hebrew because we cannot assume that all Hebraica catalogers who are required to romanize have a strong background in דקדוק.
And that rule, encoded in two editions of Hebraica cataloging is to follow the vocalization in the most recent edition of Even-Shoshan and Alkalay. Both of these dictionaries have a "sheva" under the "כ". Thus we do as Yossi says we do.
"nokheḥut".
Thanks, Heidi
Heidi G. Lerner
Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
Metadata Dept.
Stanford University Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
ph: 650-725-9953
fax: 650-725-1120
e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu
________________________________
From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces+lerner=stanford.edu at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Joan Biella <jbiella2632 at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 8:31 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] Nokhehim? Nokhhim?
Yossi knows us well. I don't think you'll find a rule in the HCM even now that would justify an /e/ between the khaf and the het, no matter how they have to be pronounced.
Joan
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Yossi Galron <jgalron at gmail.com<mailto:jgalron at gmail.com>> wrote:
Bob,
Hebrew is a living language. I don't know the grammatical rule (Sheva na? Sheva merahef?), but modern Hebrew speakers are saying Nokhehim. Try to pronounce two Khaf or Het sounds without a vowel between them.
I know my answer will not satisfy you. Maybe someone on the list will be more satisfying.
Happy Passover/Easter
Yossi
On Apr 17, 2017 21:10, "Robert M. TALBOTT" <rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu<mailto:rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
Why?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Yossi Galron <jgalron at gmail.com<mailto:jgalron at gmail.com>> wrote:
Nohekhim.
On Apr 17, 2017 18:22, "Robert M. TALBOTT" <rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu<mailto:rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
Folks:
Does נוכחים follow the pattern of lomdim (nokh[dot]him) or the pattern of mitpalelim (mokhe[dot]him)?
Thanks
B
--
Bob Talbott
Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger
UC Berkeley
250 Moffitt
Berkeley, CA 94720
I'm just mad about Saffron
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
--
Bob Talbott
Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger
UC Berkeley
250 Moffitt
Berkeley, CA 94720
I'm just mad about Saffron
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20170418/c94433a2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Heb-naco
mailing list