[Heb-NACO] FW: romanization question

[Robert M. TALBOTT]

Li-kero.  It's an infinitive, so the lamed is set off as a particle, and
the sheva under the kuf is sheva na.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Marlene Schiffman <schiffma at yu.edu> wrote:

> In addition OCLC DLC has 40 records that say li-kero.
>
>
>
> Marlene Schiffman
>
> Gottesman Library Technical Services
>
> Yeshiva University
>
> 500 West 185th Street
>
> New York, NY 10033
>
>
>
> 646 592-4276 (direct)
>
> 646 592-4100 (general office)
>
>
>
> *From:* Marlene Schiffman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:40 PM
> *To:* hasafran at lists.osu.edu
> *Subject:* romanization question
>
>
>
> לקרא
>
>
>
> Li-kro, li-kero, likro?
>
>
>
> Even Shoshan and siddurim (Hertz and Birnbaum) have sheva. Alkalay does
> not use sheva.
>
>
>
> Any ruling on this one? Thanks,
>
>
>
> Marlene Schiffman
>
> Gottesman Library Technical Services
>
> Yeshiva University
>
> 500 West 185th Street
>
> New York, NY 10033
>
>
>
> 646 592-4276 (direct)
>
> 646 592-4100 (general office)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
>


-- 
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

I'm just mad about Saffron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20160920/51f9ff53/attachment-0001.html>