[Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

[Robert M. TALBOTT]

Yes, you're right.  Thanks

B

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Shinohara, Jasmin
<jshino at pobox.upenn.edu> wrote:
> Just a quick note that it is "asupah/asupot".  :-)  Jasmin
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Robert M. TALBOTT <rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu>
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 2:43 PM
> To: Kuperman, Aaron
> Cc: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
> Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title
>
> Excellent.  Thanks, Aaron.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Kuperman, Aaron <akup at loc.gov> wrote:
>> My thoughts on how I would do it (though in my section we don't get
>> conflicts quite so often so we are still thinking about what to do):
>>
>> 1. "Kovets mefarshim"  ("collected commentaries") is very generic.  Assuming
>> there is no author/compiler, the best qualifier would be the publisher.
>>
>> 2. Within a given set, one could treat them as a single work (i.e. the
>> "Sotah" would only be in the 505 field), but probably the best way would be
>> to use the "Sotah" as a qualifier .  So assuming your example has non
>> author/compiler, the 130 would be:  Kovets mefarshim (Mekhon Baale asufot :
>> Sotah) which BTW, does not need a NAF, at least for the Law section, IJ may
>> be different.
>>
>> Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section.
>> This is not an official communication from my employer
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+akup=loc.gov at lists.osu.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Robert M. TALBOTT
>> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 12:38 PM
>> To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
>> Subject: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title
>>
>> Folks:
>>
>> 1) I have in front of me a volume called Kovets mefarshim : sotah, published
>> by Mekhon Baale asufot, 5776.
>>
>> 2) A quick look in the database reveals that Yerid ha-sefarim is also
>> publishes a superwork called Kovets maefarshim, though they have yet to
>> publish a volume on Sotah.
>>
>> 3) I am assuming that, even though Kovets mefarshim to Sotah from Yerid
>> he-sefarim doesn't exist, there is a conflict because they Y.ha-s. is
>> already using the Kovest mefarshim moniker.
>>
>> My questions:
>>
>> a) Is it a superwork if there's only one volume?
>>
>> b) Is there a conflict or am I out in the weeds?
>>
>> c) If there is a conflict, does the aap look like: Kovets mefarshim (Mekhon
>> Baale asufot) (Sotah)? I confess to being very uneasy with this
>> construction.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bob Talbott
>>
>> Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger
>>
>> UC Berkeley
>>
>> 250 Moffitt
>>
>> Berkeley, CA 94720
>>
>> יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Heb-naco mailing list
>> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
>> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Talbott
>
> Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger
>
> UC Berkeley
>
> 250 Moffitt
>
> Berkeley, CA 94720
>
> יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco



-- 
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ