[Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

[Marlene Schiffman]

Hey, Jasmin. I knew somebody would pick up on that!



Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device


-------- Original message --------
From: "Shinohara, Jasmin" <jshino at pobox.upenn.edu>
Date: 2/8/2016 9:54 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Kuperman, Aaron" <akup at loc.gov>, rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu, Hebrew Name Authority Funnel <heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

Just a quick note that it is "asupah/asupot".  :-)  Jasmin

________________________________________
From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Robert M. TALBOTT <rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 2:43 PM
To: Kuperman, Aaron
Cc: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

Excellent.  Thanks, Aaron.

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Kuperman, Aaron <akup at loc.gov> wrote:
> My thoughts on how I would do it (though in my section we don't get
> conflicts quite so often so we are still thinking about what to do):
>
> 1. "Kovets mefarshim"  ("collected commentaries") is very generic.  Assuming
> there is no author/compiler, the best qualifier would be the publisher.
>
> 2. Within a given set, one could treat them as a single work (i.e. the
> "Sotah" would only be in the 505 field), but probably the best way would be
> to use the "Sotah" as a qualifier .  So assuming your example has non
> author/compiler, the 130 would be:  Kovets mefarshim (Mekhon Baale asufot :
> Sotah) which BTW, does not need a NAF, at least for the Law section, IJ may
> be different.
>
> Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section.
> This is not an official communication from my employer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+akup=loc.gov at lists.osu.edu] On
> Behalf Of Robert M. TALBOTT
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 12:38 PM
> To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
> Subject: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title
>
> Folks:
>
> 1) I have in front of me a volume called Kovets mefarshim : sotah, published
> by Mekhon Baale asufot, 5776.
>
> 2) A quick look in the database reveals that Yerid ha-sefarim is also
> publishes a superwork called Kovets maefarshim, though they have yet to
> publish a volume on Sotah.
>
> 3) I am assuming that, even though Kovets mefarshim to Sotah from Yerid
> he-sefarim doesn't exist, there is a conflict because they Y.ha-s. is
> already using the Kovest mefarshim moniker.
>
> My questions:
>
> a) Is it a superwork if there's only one volume?
>
> b) Is there a conflict or am I out in the weeds?
>
> c) If there is a conflict, does the aap look like: Kovets mefarshim (Mekhon
> Baale asufot) (Sotah)? I confess to being very uneasy with this
> construction.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Talbott
>
> Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger
>
> UC Berkeley
>
> 250 Moffitt
>
> Berkeley, CA 94720
>
> יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>



--
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20160209/d7321bca/attachment-0001.html>