[Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

Heidi G Lerner lerner at stanford.edu
Mon Feb 8 14:24:54 EST 2016


Thanks Aaron. That works very clearly.


Heidi G. Lerner

Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica

Metadata Dept.

Stanford University Libraries

Stanford, CA 94305-6004

ph: 650-725-9953

fax: 650-725-1120

e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu


________________________________
From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Kuperman, Aaron <akup at loc.gov>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 11:14 AM
To: 'rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu'; 'Hebrew Name Authority Funnel'
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

My thoughts on how I would do it (though in my section we don't get conflicts quite so often so we are still thinking about what to do):

1. "Kovets mefarshim"  ("collected commentaries") is very generic.  Assuming there is no author/compiler, the best qualifier would be the publisher.

2. Within a given set, one could treat them as a single work (i.e. the "Sotah" would only be in the 505 field), but probably the best way would be to use the "Sotah" as a qualifier .  So assuming your example has non author/compiler, the 130 would be:  Kovets mefarshim (Mekhon Baale asufot : Sotah) which BTW, does not need a NAF, at least for the Law section, IJ may be different.

Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section.
This is not an official communication from my employer


-----Original Message-----
From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+akup=loc.gov at lists.osu.edu] On Behalf Of Robert M. TALBOTT
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 12:38 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: [Heb-NACO] super works with the same title

Folks:

1) I have in front of me a volume called Kovets mefarshim : sotah, published by Mekhon Baale asufot, 5776.

2) A quick look in the database reveals that Yerid ha-sefarim is also publishes a superwork called Kovets maefarshim, though they have yet to publish a volume on Sotah.

3) I am assuming that, even though Kovets mefarshim to Sotah from Yerid he-sefarim doesn't exist, there is a conflict because they Y.ha-s. is already using the Kovest mefarshim moniker.

My questions:

a) Is it a superwork if there's only one volume?

b) Is there a conflict or am I out in the weeds?

c) If there is a conflict, does the aap look like: Kovets mefarshim (Mekhon Baale asufot) (Sotah)? I confess to being very uneasy with this construction.

Thanks

Bob




--
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ???? ????????
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20160208/75e473bb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Heb-naco mailing list