[Heb-NACO] Sefer Kohelet 'im perush Ibn 'Ezra

Thu Jul 25 10:00:09 EDT 2013

Hi,

I guess you could use:
130 0 Bible $p Ecclesiastes.
630 0 Bible $p Ecclesiastes. $v Commentaries.

These two are also established:

Ibn Ezra, Abraham ben Meïr, ǂd 1092-1167. ǂt Perush ʻal Neviʼim u-Khetuvim
Ibn Ezra, Abraham ben Meïr, ǂd 1092-1167. ǂt Perush Ibn ʻEzra ʻal Shir ha-shirim. ǂl English & Hebrew

(The one for Kohelet is not established yet).

Kol tuv,

Neil M. Frau-Cortes

Hebraica Cataloger
McKeldin Library
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Phone (301) 405-9337
nfrau at umd.edu

From: heb-naco-bounces+nfrau=umd.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+nfrau=umd.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Judith Zupnick
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:58 AM
To: heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
Subject: [Heb-NACO] Sefer Kohelet 'im perush Ibn 'Ezra

I am cataloging the book Sefer Kohelet 'im perush Ibn 'Ezra. It has explanations by M.S. Goodman. I do not want to put either Goodman or Ibn 'Ezra in the 100 field; I will but them in 700 fields. Should I make a 130 field and should it read :
Kohelet ('Im perush Ibn 'Ezra)? Is this a correct uniform (preferred) title? Can one say "'Im perush..." in brackets?
And, as a rule, should the Cutter in a book that begins with Sefer be taken from the second word in the title, which is the first word of the uniform title, when there is a uniform title and no author main entry?
Alternatively, can this book be cataloged simply with a 245 00? (without a uniform title)? And if so, would the Cutter be taken from the first word (Sefer) or from the second word (Kohelet) in the 245 field?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20130725/add2d6f7/attachment.html>