[Heb-NACO] NOUGHTIES RE: Roger's Subject tentative weekly list 11/24

Jasmin Nof jnof at umd.edu
Tue Aug 16 15:24:27 EDT 2011


Hopefully someone with greater experience than I communicating with SACO will suggest a rejection/revision.  Then again, if it's used by the Brits for the Brits, who are we to refuse them...   I imagine there are other authorized Anglo terms in LCSH that Americans never use, no?   

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Kuperman [mailto:akup at loc.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Jasmin Nof
Cc: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel; 'magiclarpet at cox.net'; Gerstein, Nahid; Taub, Aaron; Fryser, Benjamin; Creeger, Edith; Lefkowitz, Henry; Biella, Joan
Subject: NOUGHTIES RE: Roger's Subject tentative weekly list 11/24

Apparently it is a British usage (and proposal was from the British National Library), and has not entered American usage. I suggest that it should be rejected (so send your complaints to the person who is doing the
list)

Aaron Wolfe Kuperman
Library of Congress, ABA USPL, Law Cataloging Section

This is NOT an official communication from the Library of Congress.




More information about the Heb-naco mailing list