[mvapich-discuss] Error with osu-shmempmi-slurm.patch

[Sourav Chakraborty]

Hi Vladimir,

Thanks for the clarification. We will take a look at the Slurm 16 patch and
update it.

Thanks,
Sourav


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Vladimir Florinski <vaf0001 at uah.edu>
wrote:

> Thanks, I got it. But I was confused by there being *two* patch files on
> the download page:
>
> osu-shmempmi-slurm-15.08.8.patch
>
> and
>
> osu-shmempmi-slurm-16.05.1.patch
>
> Because I am using slurm 16, I assumed the second patch should be applied.
> The only difference between the two is that the second file does not have
> shmem.c and shmem.h. Now I tried the first patch and it succeeded with
> slurm 16. To avoid confusion, I suggest removing the second patch
> altogether from the download page.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Sourav Chakraborty <
> chakraborty.52 at buckeyemail.osu.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> The files shmem.h and shmem.c are included in the patch itself and should
>> be automatically created when you apply the patch.
>>
>> Can you please apply it using the following command?
>>
>> $ cd slurm-16.05.5
>> $ patch -p1 < ../osu-shmempmi-slurm-15.08.8.patch
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sourav
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Vladimir Florinski <vaf0001 at uah.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Tried to build slurm with this patch provided by the mvapich project.
>>> The patch requested the files shmem.h and shmem.c. Where are these supposed
>>> to come from? They are not part of slurm, in the current version (16.05.5).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vladimir Florinski
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mvapich-discuss mailing list
>>> mvapich-discuss at cse.ohio-state.edu
>>> http://mailman.cse.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/mvapich-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Vladimir Florinski
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cse.ohio-state.edu/pipermail/mvapich-discuss/attachments/20161018/e893d269/attachment.html>