[mvapich-discuss] Query on OSU latency test

Matthew Koop koop at cse.ohio-state.edu
Sun Dec 30 14:02:36 EST 2007


Kartik,

A short description of each test is on our website:
http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu/benchmarks/

The main difference is that in osu_latency_mt the receiving side has
two threads competing to receive the message. This is designed to create
contention for locks and evaluate the performance of the library under
this contention.

Matt


On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Kartik Thathagar wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> My name is Kartik Thathagar. And I am working with E-Infochips in Ahmedabad.
>
>
>
> I have query regarding osu_latency and osu_latency_mt tests.
>
>
>
> I have tried to run both the tests and on both the test I got different
> results means on osu_latency I got 6.33 usec and in osu_latency_mt I got
> 11.82 usec for 4 bytes datasize so can you tell me why this different came?
>
>
>
> So can you describe me what is the difference between these to
> tests(osu_latency and osu_latency_mt)?
>
>
>
> I have already read that osu_latency_mt test is multithread receiving side
> tests. Let me know something more in this.
>
>
>
> Hope you will reply me soon.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kartik
>
>
> --
> eInfochips Business Disclaimer:
>
> This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally Privileged
> information. In case you are not the original intended Recipient of the
> message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, Disclose,distribute,
> print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete
> it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those
> of the individual sender unless otherwise stated.Nothing contained in
> this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer
> by eInfochips Limited and/or eInfochips Inc(“eInfochips”) unless sent
> with that express intent and with due authority of eInfochips.EInfochips
> has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However
> the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this email.
>
>




More information about the mvapich-discuss mailing list