MCLC: infighting over pollution solutions

[Denton, Kirk]

MCLC LIST
From: kirk (denton.2 at osu.edu)
Subject: infighting over pollution solutions
***********************************************************

Source: NYT (3/21/13):
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/22/world/asia/as-chinas-environmental-woes-w
orsen-infighting-emerges-as-biggest-obstacle.html

As Pollution Worsens in China, Solutions Succumb to Infighting
By EDWARD WONG 

BEIJING — China’s state leadership transition has taken place this month
against an ominous backdrop. More than 16,000 dead pigshave been found
floating in rivers that provide drinking water to Shanghai. A haze akin to
volcanic fumes cloaked the capital, causing convulsive coughing and
obscuring the portrait of Mao Zedong on the gate to the Forbidden City.

So severe are China’s environmental woes, especially the noxious air, that
top government officials have been forced to openly acknowledge them. Fu
Ying, the spokeswoman for the National People’s Congress, said she checked
for smog every morning after opening her curtains and kept at home face
masks for her daughter and herself. Li Keqiang, the new prime minister,
said the air pollution had made him “quite upset” and vowed to “show even
greater resolve and make more vigorous efforts” to clean it up.

What the leaders neglect to say is that infighting within the government
bureaucracy is one of the biggest obstacles to enacting stronger
environmental policies. Even as some officials push for tighter
restrictions on pollutants, state-owned enterprises — especially China’s
oil and power companies — have been putting profits ahead of health in
working to outflank new rules, according to government data and interviews
with people involved in policy negotiations.

For instance, even though trucks and buses crisscrossing China are far
worse for the environment than any other vehicles, the oil companies have
delayed for years an improvement in the diesel fuel those vehicles burn.
As a result, the sulfur levels of diesel in China are at least 23 times
that of the United States. As for power companies, the three biggest ones
in the country are all repeat violators of government restrictions on
emissions from coal-burning plants; offending power plants are found
across the country, from Inner Mongolia to the southwest metropolis of
Chongqing.

The state-owned enterprises are given critical roles in policy-making on
environmental standards. The committees that determine fuel standards, for
example, are housed in the buildings of an oil company. Whether the
enterprises can be forced to follow, rather than impede, environmental
restrictions will be a critical test of the commitment of Mr. Li and Xi
Jinping, the new party chief and president, to curbing the influence of
vested interests in the economy.

Last month, after deadly air pollution hit record levels in northern
China, officials led by Wen Jiabao, then the prime minister, put forward
strict new fuel standards that the oil companies had blocked for years.
But there are doubts about whether the oil companies will comply,
especially since oil officials resisted a similar government order for
higher-grade fuel four years ago. State-owned power companies have been
similarly resistant. The companies regularly ignore government orders to
upgrade coal-burning electricity plants, according to ministry data. And
as with the oil companies, the power companies exert an outsize influence
over environmental policy debates.

In 2011, during a round of discussions over stricter emissions standards,
the China Electricity Council <http://english.cec.org.cn/AboutUs.html>,
which represents the companies, pushed back hard against the proposals,
saying that the costs of upgrading the plants would be too high.

“During the procedure of setting the standard, the companies or the
industry councils have a lot of influence,” said Zhou Rong, a campaign
manager on energy issues for Greenpeace East Asia. “My personal opinion is
even if we have the most stringent standards for every sector, the
companies will violate those.”

On Feb. 28, Deutsche Bank released an analysts’ note saying that China’s
current economic policies would result in an enormous surge in coal
consumption and automobile sales over the next decade. “China’s air
pollution will become a lot worse from the already unbearable level,” the
analysts said, calling for drastic policy changes and “a strong government
will to overcome the opposition from interest groups.”
The report estimated that the number of passenger cars in China was on
track to hit 400 million by 2030, up from 90 million now.

For the most part, Chinese automakers have supported upgrading cars with
cleaner technology, which makes them more marketable worldwide,
environmental advocates say. But better technology cannot operate properly
without high-quality fuel, and this is where the bottleneck occurs.

The system of forging fuel standards has led to fierce bureaucratic
infighting.

The Ministry of Environmental Protection <http://english.mep.gov.cn/> is
the main government advocate for both higher fuel standards and better
automobile technology. It has the power to force automakers to use new
technology by issuing stricter tailpipe emissions standards, but it cannot
unilaterally impose new fuel standards or enforce compliance from the oil
companies. Instead, it can merely lobby other relevant ministries or
agencies to take action.

When fuel standards do not keep pace with vehicle technology, the
environmental ministry has to delay issuing new tailpipe emissions
standards, and so cars do not get upgraded.

Fuel standards are issued by the Standardization Administration
<http://www.sac.gov.cn/> of China, which convenes a committee and a
subcommittee to research standards.

They each have 30 to 40 members, almost all of whom are from oil
companies, said Yue Xin, a scientist who sits on one of the groups on
behalf of the Ministry of Environmental Protection.

The members from the oil companies “will represent more of the company’s
interests,” Mr. Yue said. Sinopec and PetroChina, two of the biggest oil
companies, have insisted that consumers or the government pay to upgrade
their refineries to produce cleaner fuel, and they have delayed approving
higher standards unless there is consensus on who pays.

“Sinopec for years has never argued against the need to improve China’s
standards,” said David Vance Wagner, a senior researcher at the
International Council on Clean Transportation who used to work under the
Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection. “They’ve just argued about
the finance of it.”

In late January, Fu Chengyu, chairman of Sinopec, acknowledged that the
oil companies bore some responsibility for air pollution, but he also
argued that the government’s fuel standards were not high enough,
according to Xinhua, the state news agency. What Mr. Fu failed to explain
was that oil company representatives on the committees researching fuel
standards have been the main impediment to pushing through better
standards.

Mr. Yue and others say that because of constant haggling by the oil
companies, the government for years delayed issuing upgraded China IV
diesel standards that are on par with European standards. On Feb. 6, after
the uproar over record-breaking air pollution, the State Council, China’s
cabinet, smashed the gridlock by putting out guidelines that called for a
nationwide adoption of the new China IV diesel standards by the end of
2014.

It also set deadlines on the issuing and phasing in of even cleaner China
V standards. The next day, the Standardization Administration of China
issued the upgraded China IV diesel standards that the oil companies had
been trying to delay for years.

But the costs of upgrading could still lead the oil companies to ignore
the new standards, which is what they did when the State Council in 2009
ordered a phase-in of the China III diesel standard.

In the Feb. 6 announcement, the State Council said the government needed
to create a fiscal policy to support the refinery upgrades, but the
Ministry of Finance has yet to make the policy.

Another big concern lies in the debate over the cleaner China V gasoline
standard, which the State Council said must be issued by December and
phased in by the end of 2017. In the committee debates, Sinopec argues
that it is expensive to meet the requirements for sulfur levels.
Oil company representatives did not reply to requests for comment. In
public, oil company executives are trying to shift the blame. Mr. Fu told
reporters this month that “in fact the biggest killer is coal.”

Beijing officials have said that vehicle emissions account for 22 percent
of the main deadly particulate matter in the air, known as PM 2.5, and
another 40 percent is from coal-fired factories in Beijing and nearby
provinces.

In February, the Ministry of Environmental Protection issued stricter
factory emissions standards for six coal-burning industries. First on the
list is the power industry, which accounts for about half the coal
consumption in China.

But compliance by the state-owned enterprises could be a problem. The
environmental ministry publishes annual lists of factories that have
violated emissions regulations. A review shows that the factories are all
run by the biggest power companies.

The annual lists represent only a fraction of the plants in violation,
since installation by the factories of monitoring equipment is spotty, and
the equipment readings can be manipulated, said Kevin Jianjun Tu, an
energy scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Another problem is the low penalties: fines are generally capped around
$16,000, not much of a deterrent, said Ms. Zhou, the Greenpeace
representative. She said the violating factories “should be required to
stop production temporarily — that would then force companies to take this
seriously.”

Mia Li and Amy Qin contributed research from Beijing, and Chris Buckley
contributed reporting from Hong Kong.