[Vwoolf] A minor mystery in G. Patton Wright's Mrs Dalloway edition
Edward Mendelson
edward.mendelson at columbia.edu
Sun Aug 11 10:54:13 EDT 2024
!-------------------------------------------------------------------|
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------!
This is a question that is almost entirely a time-waster, but I'm
posting in the hope that someone has a solution.
G. Patton Wright's edition of Mrs Dalloway includes an extensive list of
variants in all editions published before 1990, including many that have
no textual authority, such as his "E7," the 1964 reset edition in
Penguin Modern Classics, scanned and online here in its 1972 impression:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://archive.org/details/mrsdalloway0000wool_d4e7/page/6/mode/2up__;!!KGKeukY!z-VYIE08VEvVG96tr-4314iTtTyupaZDbvB12l1MGmEvQ5aqwYhcSZr0JMjHLgUgITtdw-JheE1P2s49rwG00b_v1AIz9ijMPfM$
The mystery is this: Patton Wright lists perhaps a half-dozen variants
in which the first-edition text is a word followed by a four-dot
ellipsis, but the "variant" seems to be exactly the same. For example,
one entry in his list (at the foot of his p. 195) reads:
142.20 music. . . . ] music. . . . E7-8
There are similar entries for 136.29, 140.08, 161.27, and 169.17.
Possibly I missed others. In every case, the two "variant" readings seem
to be identical, and the texts also seem to be identical (in the 1925
edition that Wright uses as his copy text and in the Penguin
resetting). The number of dots, and the spacing between the dots, seem
to be the same in every case.
Again, this doesn't matter because the 1964 text has no authority, but I
would be grateful to learn whether or not I'm missing something obvious.
More information about the Vwoolf
mailing list