[Vwoolf] Virginia Woolf: bi-polar

Madelyn Detloff detlofmm at miamioh.edu
Sat Mar 10 07:54:52 EST 2018


I hesitate to enter this conversation again, since we have had forms of it for years on this list and it always seems to devolve into an either or - either trauma or neuroaffective atypicality as if we are not allowed to imagine that Woolf might have been a survivor of sexual abuse and someone who may have had a condition that looks like what we call  bipolar disorder or some other atypicality that she lived with while also being a prolific author and critic.  There is  stigma connected to each hypothesis that we ought to challenge.  What  I wish for us as a community of scholars is that we don’t fall prey to the desire to ‘rescue’ Woolf’s  reputation from one stigma by reinforcing the stigma of the other hypothesis.  

There have been a number of well meaning posts that nevertheless participate in ableist logic and language regarding neuroaffective atypicality.  Woolf was not “crazy” or “insane” whether or not she experienced something like bipolar disorder, or PTSD, or some mixture of both (I happen to think both is quite likely).  To be sure, there has been a lot of damage done in the name of psychiatry, medicine, other various forms of ‘cure’ that aim to normalize our body minds. We ought to expose and critique that damage.  But I think we can do that without suggesting that people who take medicine or other therapies for neuroaffective atypicalities (lithium for example) are somehow suffering from false consciousness or are  to be distinguished from “essentially sane” people who have mood swings or struggle with PTSD.  

I’ve written a little about this dilemma in the Blackwell Companion to Woolf
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118457917.ch20/summary. It also might be helpful to read Alison Kafer’s Feminist Queer Crip on the ‘curative imaginary,’ as well as Margaret Price’s Mad at School.  


Please note: what I write is not directed at any one post or poster on this list.  The discussion we are having now has a long history on this list and I worry that we are simply repeating our positions rather than evolving them. 

Best,

Madelyn

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 7, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Diane Reynolds via Vwoolf <vwoolf at lists.osu.edu> wrote:
> 
> Ellen,
> 
> I have not had this question come up in class, but it is topical and relevant. In my Quaker meeting, we have concerns about gun control being off-loaded, as it were, onto the mentally ill, however, that term is defined, and we fear it will lead to further stigmatization of mental illness, especially bi-polar disorders—and of course, Woolf feared the consequences of her illness. What I would emphasize with Woolf,  is that mental illness is increasingly understood to come out of childhood trauma and that while it is biological to some extent, our brain biology actually changes to become more “depressive” as a result of trauma. This is in an interesting article: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2018/02/will-take-political-revolution-cure-epidemic-depression.html that makes the point that if we want to reduce mental illness, we need to fix society. This seems to me, in the context of Woolf, a good launching point for trying to imagine what it was like trying to grow up in that Victorian household with abusive half brothers, a self-absorbed father, a mother stretched too thin who labeled her “goat” and the whole set of oppressive mores—you well know the drill—that beset her. 
> _______________________________________________
> Vwoolf mailing list
> Vwoolf at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwoolf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/vwoolf/attachments/20180310/11881333/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vwoolf mailing list