[Intl_DxMedPhys] Display Workstation Photometer Recommendations

[Bevins, Nick B]

Ditto for the Calibrite Display Pro HL (currently $200) and pacsDisplay (free). The pacsdisplay.org website also has html-based display QC tools with test patterns and gray levels if you don’t have an easy way to access/display them otherwise (assuming the workstation has a modern browser installed).

- another Nick

Nicholas Bevins, Ph.D., FAAPM, DABR, CIIP
Imaging Physicist and Associate Radiation Safety Officer
Maine Medical Center
w 207-662-4276 | p 207-758-0292
nick.bevins at mainehealth.org

From: Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list-bounces+nick.bevins=mainehealth.org at lists.osu.edu> On Behalf Of Nicholas Graham via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2026 10:27 PM
To: High, Maynard <Maynard.High at wmchealth.org>
Cc: DxMedPhys List <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu> <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Intl_DxMedPhys] Display Workstation Photometer Recommendations

I like the Display Pro HL from Calibrite. It’s the updated version of the (now discontinued) X-Rite i1DisplayPro that’s recommended by pacsdisplay. org. It’s not strictly standalone, since it requires a computer, but the pacsDisplay software

I like the Display Pro HL from Calibrite. It’s the updated version of the (now discontinued) X-Rite i1DisplayPro that’s recommended by pacsdisplay. org. It’s not strictly standalone, since it requires a computer, but the pacsDisplay software
I like the Display Pro HL from Calibrite. It’s the updated version of the (now discontinued) X-Rite i1DisplayPro that’s recommended by pacsdisplay.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/pacsdisplay.org__;!!KGKeukY!z4vAz0ktuNCe4UZWErPR-vhazidCV4WjOa_jgAqCik_zDzyeUgKDT9eKMaDj7WLagZ1MkgF5bQwqZAozATcA_8WCXYZ59Aj3ZQJ5f4s$>. It’s not strictly standalone, since it requires a computer, but the pacsDisplay  software is free, portable, and works with the Display Pro HL. It’s what I use for all of my clients that read for New York facilities.
I just make sure to cross-calibrate with my Raysafe once per year, and I’ve never had an issue.

-Nick

On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 1:31 PM High, Maynard via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu<mailto:intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu>> wrote:
I am looking for an inexpensive, robust, reasonably accurate standalone light meter (lux and cd/m2) that I can send out to our remote Locum radiologist homes (there are about 50) scattered throughout the US, and use in a video chat with me to
I am looking for an inexpensive, robust, reasonably accurate standalone light meter (lux and cd/m2) that I can send out to our remote Locum radiologist homes (there are about 50) scattered throughout the US, and use in a video chat with me to perform GSDF conformance, luminance uniformity and ambient light evaluation on an annual basis.

I dont need an expensive traceable primary calibration instrument as I am expecting to lose a few of these in the send and return process.  I plan to cross-calibrate with my  RaySafe photometer.

Thanks in advance for and recommendations.

Maynard High
Medical Physics: Westchester Medical Center - NYMC
914-493-1410
maynard.high at wmchealth.org<mailto:maynard.high at wmchealth.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list/attachments/20260709/05dce9eb/attachment.html>