[Intl_DxMedPhys] Article in today's ACR Daily Email newsletter

[Dr M. Mahesh]

We are discussing the same.

MM
Be Curious!

“Please do not feel obligated to respond after normal working hours”
=================================================================
M. Mahesh, MS, PhD, FAAPM, FACR, FACMP, FSCCT, FIOMP.
Professor - The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science

President - American Association of Physicists in Medicine

JHOC, Suite 4264
601 N Caroline Street,
Baltimore, MD 21287-0856
(410) <tel:(410)%C2%A0955-5115> 955-5115<tel:(410)%C2%A0955-5115> (O)
(410) 404-8742 (M)
================================================================

On Sep 11, 2025, at 12:14 PM, Kalpana M. Kanal <kkanal at uw.edu> wrote:



      External Email - Use Caution



FYI,
We were asked by a journalist to respond and we prepared some comments last week and shared with the journalist. Our chairman was involved in preparing the comments.

Hope AAPM does come out with a response Mahesh.

Kalpana


Kalpana M. Kanal, PhD, DABR, FACR, FAAPM, FSABI

Director, Diagnostic Physics Section and Resident Education

Program Director, Imaging Physics Residency Program

Professor, Radiology

Affiliate Faculty, Harborview Injury Prevention Center (HIPRC)

Adj. Professor, Oral Medicine

University of Washington  | 1959 ne pacific street | box 357987 | seattle, wa 98195-7987 |

office location: 222F Portage Bay Bldg

email: kkanal at uw.edu<mailto:kkanal at uw.edu> | v: 206-616-9166 | pg: 206-680-6391 | f: 206-543-8356

________________________________
From: Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list-bounces+kkanal=uw.edu at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Dr M. Mahesh via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 10:10:30 AM
To: Bob Kobistek <bob at rjkmedphys.com>
Cc: intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Intl_DxMedPhys] Article in today's ACR Daily Email newsletter

Bob: Good observation - we are reviewing both the article and the editorial that went w the article which call out on the AAPM position statement. Will keep you posted if we decide to respond. Mahesh Be Curious! “Please do not feel obligated
Bob: Good observation - we are reviewing both the article and the editorial that went w the article which call out on the AAPM position statement.

Will keep you posted if we decide to respond.

Mahesh

Be Curious!


“Please do not feel obligated to respond after normal working hours”

=================================================================

M. Mahesh, MS, PhD, FAAPM, FACR, FACMP, FSCCT, FIOMP.

Professor - The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science


President - American Association of Physicists in Medicine


JHOC, Suite 4264

601 N Caroline Street,

Baltimore, MD 21287-0856

(410) <tel:(410)%C2%A0955-5115> 955-5115<tel:(410)%C2%A0955-5115> (O)

(410) 404-8742 (M)

================================================================

On Sep 11, 2025, at 11:59 AM, Bob Kobistek via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu> wrote:



      External Email - Use Caution



Check this out: Exposure to Computed Tomography Before Pregnancy and Risk for Pregnancy Loss and Congenital Anomalies: A Population-Based Cohort Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 0, No 0 Be prepared for the mainstream press to get hold

Check this out:  Exposure to Computed Tomography Before Pregnancy and Risk for Pregnancy Loss and Congenital Anomalies: A Population-Based Cohort Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 0, No 0<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03479__;!!KGKeukY!2RFiwk-DhCEzP1hEYpNHsMYSNb-6qlx646jkJZ7UBqULioIM9Ol_odI2MlR7Mc0MTMfHfEHYejqKxkMqHbZzoLKNlDRBQo5Mj54Qeg$>



Be prepared for the mainstream press to get hold of this and sensationalize it.



My observations:



Is the increase in spontaneous abortion due to the CT scans or the reasons the patients got the CT scans to begin with? The authors acknowledge that the majority of the cohort had diabetes, hypertension, obesity or were smokers. (Smokers and pregnant???)



The results also make the statement, “The risk observed with head CT was not consistently lower than with CT of the abdomen, pelvis, or lower spine.”  How is that possible unless the increased rate of spontaneous abortion was due to some factor other than X-ray exposure?







Robert J. Kobistek, MS, FACR, DABR, MRSE(MRSC™)

Medical Physicist

RJK Medical Physics, Inc.

440-463-7879


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list/attachments/20250911/7cbf635b/attachment.html>