[Intl_DxMedPhys] Are shielding surveys for replacements required?

[Nima Kasraie]

These questions that I ask over the years often have a common theme: how do you convince admins of a “good practice” when there is spotty/hazy/confusing regulatory coverage on it.

Like, how do you respond to “that’s fine, but is it in the state regs?”?

In the case of NM and CT, JC is often equivocally clear, but for e.g. fluoro, I’m not very pleased (as a QMP) having to constantly go to battle and put up an offensive to establish the need for implementing certain safeguards or good practices. Some things should be obvious. In my mind, in an ideal world, the word of a QMP should be enough. I shouldn’t have to pull out a string of regulations and standards and flash them at everybody to convince them that certain things are needed.

One time, a client told me that they did not need a shielding inspection for their SPECT-CT upgrade, because “GE has provided it to us”.


Thanks to all.


Nima




From: Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list-bounces at lists.osu.edu> On Behalf Of John Sadler via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 12:17 PM
To: Eugene Mah <eugenemah at gmail.com>
Cc: intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu
Subject: Re: [Intl_DxMedPhys] Are shielding surveys for replacements required?

Even if it is not regulatory, it is good practice. Not only does it confirm that the shielding is adequate, but it can also detect irregularities with the system. John Sadler, MS, DABR Licensed Medical Physicist Mobile 214-924-0046 John. Sadler@ 

Even if it is not regulatory, it is good practice. Not only does it confirm that the shielding is adequate, but it can also detect irregularities with the system. John Sadler, MS, DABR Licensed Medical Physicist Mobile 214-924-0046 John. Sadler@ mac. com
Even if it is not regulatory, it is good practice.

Not only does it confirm that the shielding is adequate, but it can also detect irregularities with the system.



John Sadler, MS, DABR
Licensed Medical Physicist
Mobile 214-924-0046
John.Sadler at mac.com<mailto:John.Sadler at mac.com>


On Sep 9, 2025, at 10:45 AM, Eugene Mah via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu<mailto:intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu>> wrote:

South Carolina regulations require a new shielding plan and shielding evaluation whenever a new x-ray system is installed or replaces an existing system. Eugene --------------------------------------------------------------------- Eugene Mah,
South Carolina regulations require a new shielding plan and shielding evaluation whenever a new x-ray system is installed or replaces an existing system.

Eugene

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Eugene Mah, Ph.D., DABR               eugenemah at gmail.com<mailto:eugenemah at gmail.com>
Medical Physicist                     maheug at musc.edu<mailto:maheug at musc.edu>
                                      "For I am a Bear of Very Little
                                       Brain, and long words Bother
Charleston, SC 29425                   me." - Winnie the Pooh
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://v16.imablog.net/__;!!KGKeukY!xT9iutn2jwORt5mB22kZtrJx4dd9UJ1GgSQO-e94qOFwg7n88JTh7c2GT6O91odlM0u60B3On6re9DXyeRp9JFNMwvZBueN2eSIk1mHcs0_rofc-18Hx2A$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/v16.imablog.net/__;!!KGKeukY!3fYTxnODWFhpPwU11j1j_M3uMCCu7FoYXn9EiILzwW1tg_GQ70QdPkbNrFhTX1mjf6COWi7qFXTp1Gd8ZYNeCl4k3QLCEn4PL77NCiVF$>              Jabber: imabug at imabug.net<mailto:imabug at imabug.net>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://blog.ab4ug.net/__;!!KGKeukY!xT9iutn2jwORt5mB22kZtrJx4dd9UJ1GgSQO-e94qOFwg7n88JTh7c2GT6O91odlM0u60B3On6re9DXyeRp9JFNMwvZBueN2eSIk1mHcs0_rofct7-mKXw$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/blog.ab4ug.net/__;!!KGKeukY!3fYTxnODWFhpPwU11j1j_M3uMCCu7FoYXn9EiILzwW1tg_GQ70QdPkbNrFhTX1mjf6COWi7qFXTp1Gd8ZYNeCl4k3QLCEn4PL_nJuMDe$>
PGP KeyID                             PGP key available on request O-
0x56B705CAE9542BB8
---------------------------------------------------------------------


On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 2:39 PM Nima Kasraie via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu<mailto:intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu>> wrote:
Hi all, If you replace a fluoro room with a similar model and vendor with no changes to room shielding and walls, do you still need to do a shielding survey, legally speaking? TJC says yes. But what about the states? For example, in Texas, I
Hi all,

If you replace a fluoro room with a similar model and vendor with no changes to room shielding and walls, do you still need to do a shielding survey, legally speaking?

TJC says yes.

But what about the states?

For example, in Texas, I find no mention of the state regs where they compel a shielding survey for diagnostic X-ray/fluoroscopy rooms. It’s not in TAC 289.227, nor any of the adopted rules I could find.

But if the state doesn’t ask for it, can they expect a post-installation shielding confirmation—especially for high-dose fluoro rooms—even if that expectation isn't explicitly stated in 227?


I find it hard to accept that the state wouldn’t have any specific language on this issue.



Nima


________________________________

UT Southwestern

Medical Center

The future of medicine, today.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list/attachments/20250909/fa9ac62a/attachment.html>