[Intl_DxMedPhys] The end of LNT and ALARA?

Gary garyi at paxradia.com
Sat May 24 23:15:17 EDT 2025


!-------------------------------------------------------------------|
  This Message Is From an External Sender
  This message came from outside your organization.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------!

One thing it may mean is a rebirth of nuclear energy for the US.  Pro tip: now is the time to invest.


---
Thanks,
Gary Isenhower


On Sat, 24 May 2025 17:24:33 +0000, Mary Ellen Jafari via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu> wrote:

>I didn't post the announcement from the White House to generate
>political commentary but rather to start a discussion on implications
>of such a change to radiology, medical physics, and occupational
>radiational workers, and how our professional organizations should
>respond to the Executive Order.
>
>I'm not the list moderator but is it possible to keep the discussion
>focused on those issues?
>
>Thank you.
>Mary Ellen
>
>Mary Ellen Jafari, MS, DABR (D,N), MRSE, MRSO, FACR, FAAPM, CIIP
>Chief Physicist and Regional Radiation Safety Officer
>
>Kaiser Permanente
>Southern California Permanente Medical Group Medical Imaging
>Technology and Informatics 199 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena CA 91101
>626-430-1231 (office mobile)
>Maryellen.Jafari at kp.org
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list
><intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list-bounces at lists.osu.edu> On Behalf Of Nicole
>Ranger via Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2025
>10:19 AM To: David Clunie <dclunie at dclunie.com> Cc:
>intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu Subject: Re: [Intl_DxMedPhys]
>The end of LNT and ALARA?
>
>Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open
>attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>I can’t help but feel that all these maneuvers are distractions. Also
>would be interested to learn of any binding agreements between the
>U.S. and the IAEA that are predicated on the long-standing and stable
>agreements around these regulatory concepts and limits.  International
>shipping of radioactive sources, enforcement of waste handling
>procedures, etc…
>
>These concepts should be agreed upon through scientific consensus and
>not political grandstanding.
>
>Nicole
>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 24, 2025, at 12:09 PM, David Clunie via
>> Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list
>> <intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list at lists.osu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe this is a great way to improve genetic diversity in the US
>> population with more mutations, to substitute for a lack of
>> immigration.  
>
>NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:  If you are not the intended recipient of this
>e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using
>or disclosing its contents.  If you have received this e-mail in
>error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
>permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading,
>forwarding or saving them. v.173.295  Thank you.
 


More information about the Intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list mailing list