[Intl_DxMedPhys] Apron lead equivalence for FGI procedures

[Harry Ingleby]

Hi all,

Following up on my previous question about Rampart and similar systems, what are your thoughts on primary interventionalists using aprons with 0.35 mm lead equivalence vs 0.5 mm for FGI procedures, as suggested here?

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724001028__;!!KGKeukY!wXmQjudU_n3_41FVsIBD1uLkZcOzLf9G9Onb6UfV7EIEaxsEnRiecURAm19lvCs8inyQcrfjMBQf0v-86S4dqbZbZH1N20jbFAKtrS0Fk_cbwhg$ 

All opinions welcome, either online or offline!

Cheers,
Harry

--
Harry Ingleby, PhD, MCCPM
Imaging Physicist
CancerCare Manitoba
hingleby at cancercare.mb.ca

Disclaimer : This email (including any attachments or enclosed documents) is intended for the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, copying or dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately, return the original (if applicable) and delete the email. Avis : Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) est destiné à la personne ou aux personnes à qui il est adressé, et peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels, privés ou protégés par un privilège juridique. Toute utilisation, divulgation, distribution, copie ou diffusion non autorisée est strictement défendue. Si vous avez reçu le présent courriel par erreur, veuillez en informer immédiatement l’expéditeur, retourner l’original (le cas échéant) et supprimer ce courriel.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/private/intl_dxmedphys_wd_osu_list/attachments/20250513/071d5dd1/attachment.html>