[Heb-NACO] romanization question

[Gottschalk, Haim]

Hi Heidi,

You are correct with the Romanization. I believe that the sheva under the gimel would be ignored in this case per the HCM.

Haim

From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu> On Behalf Of Heidi G Lerner via Heb-naco
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 2:59 PM
To: heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
Subject: [Heb-NACO] romanization question

Hi all,

The verb "מתאגדים"

I believe that it would be romanized as:

"mitagdim"  as per RDA Hebraica

The first and most easily definable of these categories is the sheṿa occurring between the second and third consonants of the plural forms of benoni (participles, nouns, etc. having the same vowel pattern) and other verb forms of the pa‘al/ḳal, pi‘el, and hitpa‘el binyanim (stems), including all sheṿas following consonants with dagesh ḥazaḳ
Any agreement or disagreement would be greatly appreciated




I look forward to hearing from those  who agree and those who don't.



Thanks, Heidi



Heidi G. Lerner

Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica

Metadata Dept.

Stanford University Libraries

Stanford, CA 94305-6004

ph: 650-725-9953

fax: 650-725-1120

e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu<mailto:lerner at stanford.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20200806/62a60c2f/attachment-0001.html>