[Heb-NACO] בגלל

[Gabriel Angulo]

Hi Jasmin,

It appears that most libraries opt for bi-gelal. Try a title search in
connexion, you'll see that there are un-authorized variants.

Gabe Angulo

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 12:09 PM Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco <
heb-naco at lists.osu.edu> wrote:

> Hello Collective Wisdom, please remind me: if there’s an entry in E-Sh.,
> even if it ends with a “see also”, is that sufficient justification for
> romanizing the word as a word as opposed to a compound? E.g. בגלל has a
> direct entry, so I’d think it would be romanized biglal (NOT bigelal
> because as a whole word, the sheva would be considered merahef, ignored in
> romanization), but the entry also says “see גלל”. So which is it: Biglal
> or Bi-gelal?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Jasmin
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Jasmin Shinohara
>
> Hebraica Cataloging Librarian
>
> University of Pennsylvania
>
> Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
>
> 3420 Walnut Street
>
> Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206
>
> T. 215-746-6397
>
> jshino at upenn.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20190207/2f19d613/attachment-0001.html>