[Heb-NACO] Be-halmot ha-patish

[Barry Walfish]

Ah, OK, otsev rather then etsev. Yes, then, I agree, it should be otsbekha, with kamats katan.

Barry

________________________________
From: Heb-naco [heb-naco-bounces at lists.osu.edu] on behalf of Joan Biella [jbiella2632 at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:11 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] Be-halmot ha-patish

That would be fine if the ‘ayin were pointed with patah, but apparently it has kamats katan.

Joan

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 12, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Barry Walfish <barry.walfish at utoronto.ca<mailto:barry.walfish at utoronto.ca>> wrote:

I'd say, definitely 'atsbekha, with a patah. It's from 'etsev, just like 'eved. So, 'atsbekha, like 'avdekha.

Barry

Barry Dov Walfish, Ph.D.
Judaica Bibliographaer and Curator (em.)
University of Toronto Libraries
Toronto, ON M5S 1A5
Canada
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20180613/e9ee673f/attachment-0001.html>