[Heb-NACO] moladeti or moladti

[Joan Biella]

My opinion, same as it always was:  the tav can’t have a dagesh if a vowel (even a sheva!) precedes it.  And it does have a dagesh, so ...

Regards to all from Joan


Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Shinohara, Jasmin <jshino at pobox.upenn.edu> wrote:
> 
> I would think it’s the latter, but there are many records (PCC and DLC) with the former. There is a sheva under the dalet and the taf has a dagesh and a hirik (מוֹלַדְתִּי). As far as I can tell the sheva is not na’ (and if it’s merahef, it’s also disregarded per romanization rules), so then why the e after the d? We’ve long established that pronunciation is not the arbiter, the vocalization is, so what am I missing?
>  
> Thanks, Jasmin
>  
> ---
> Jasmin Shinohara
> Hebraica Cataloging Librarian
> University of Pennsylvania
> Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
> 3420 Walnut Street
> Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206
> T. 215-746-6397
> jshino at upenn.edu
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20180411/f52c2656/attachment-0001.html>