[Heb-NACO] grammar question
Marlene Schiffman
schiffma at yu.edu
Sun Apr 8 13:22:08 EDT 2018
According to Larry, some constructs function with 2 forms. He will look into your question for further examples.
On Apr 5, 2018 6:11 PM, Barry Walfish <barry.walfish at utoronto.ca> wrote:
The simple answer is that the Tanakh doesn't always follow the rules of grammar, which were formulated hundreds of years later. For sacred texts, oral tradition overrules grammatical precision.
Hag sameah, everyone,
Barry
________________________________
From: Heb-naco [heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish=utoronto.ca at lists.osu.edu] on behalf of Heidi G Lerner [lerner at stanford.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 3:32 PM
To: heb-naco
Subject: [Heb-NACO] grammar question
Hi all,
I am chanting chapters 5-8 of Shir ha-shirim this coming Shabat.
I have a grammar question.
The text in Shir ha-shirim has "אַשְׁקְךָ֙ מִיַּ֣יִן הָרֶ֔קַח"
My question is why is there a pataḥ under the first yud instead of a tsere.
I have checked several different editions of the Tanakh as well as Briggs-Driver.
According to Even-Shoshan and Luaḣ ha-Shemot יין in סמיכות would have a "tsere" under the 1st yud.
Thanks, Heidi
Heidi G. Lerner
Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
Metadata Dept.
Stanford University Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
ph: 650-725-9953
fax: 650-725-1120
e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20180408/94b6732c/attachment.html>
More information about the Heb-naco
mailing list