[Heb-NACO] hebrew dates in 264 redux

[Heidi G Lerner]

Thank you Ahavah, this is very helpful.


Jasmin, RDA 2.8.6.2 does not specify an order of preference for source of information of date of publication within a resource if it does not appear in the same source as the title proper.


It is ambiguous which should be considered more authoritative; a date of publication without the month which is presented formally on a title page verso or a date with a month on the back cover. Probably neither is wrong. Perhaps the AJL RAS cataloging committee might want to come up with a best practice; however for those of us who create bib records for PCC will follow more common guidelines, even if they don't really exist.


Guidelines for recording Hebrew dates in vernacular fields is found in the recently updated document.


Best, Heidi




PCC Guidelines for Creating Bibliographic
Records in Multiple Character Sets






Heidi G. Lerner

Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica

Metadata Dept.

Stanford University Libraries

Stanford, CA 94305-6004

ph: 650-725-9953

fax: 650-725-1120

e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu


________________________________
From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-bounces+lerner=stanford.edu at lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Ahava Cohen <soferim at 013net.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:08 AM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] hebrew dates in 264 redux

The dates on the covers of books have legal standing in Israel. According to paragraph 5b of the Books and Authors Law publishers must put the date of printing (publication) of the first edition of the book on the outside cover of print versions. The law was recently amended and it is unclear if publishers will continue providing this date past September 2016.

For what it's worth, the Israeli national cataloging committee recently ruled that this date may be used as a publication statement in the absence of an explicit publication statement, but that the cover is a less preferred source than are the title page and title page verso. This date does not, despite the wording of the law, serve as an edition statement in and of itself.

Ahava

---------
Ahava Cohen
Head, Hebrew Cataloguing Department
National Library of Israel

---- Original Message ----
From: "Shinohara, Jasmin" <jshino at pobox.upenn.edu>
To: "Hebrew Name Authority Funnel" <heb-naco at lists.osu.edu>
Sent: Wed, Jun 29, 2016, 1:19 AM
Subject: [Heb-NACO] hebrew dates in 264 redux

Following our committee meeting, and to be sure I have it straight, please confirm that PCC now follows LC and we are to supply non-Latin script for Hebrew dates in the vernacular 264 (and Arabic dates in rom. 264).

Also, I'm noticing many cases when the date appears on the back of the book, e.g. ???? 2015, the bib record disregards that information and only records what appears on the t.p. verso (typically ©???"?, ©2015, or ©???? 2015]), so bibs currently have 2641 [775 = 2015] or [775 = Yuli 2015] with a 2644 for the © dates.   Shouldn't it just be 2641 Yuli 2015 (and vern 2641 ???? 2015) with fixed fields DtSt e/Date 1 2015/Date 2 07?

Thanks, Jasmin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20160629/5efc4f15/attachment-0001.html>