[Heb-NACO] romanization question

[Yossi Galron]

I would disagree:

The correct form would be (IMO) Kime-tahave as in כמטחווי-קשת
See Genesis 21:16 and ES, vol. 2, page 641





Joseph (Yossi) Galron-Goldschläger
E-Mail: galron.1 at osu.edu  or jgalron at gmail.com
Tel.: (614) 292-3362,  Fax: (614)292-1918
Lexicon of Modern Hebrew Literature: http://go.osu.edu/hebrewlit

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Barry Walfish <barry.walfish at utoronto.ca>
wrote:

>  I would go with the first option, following ES.
>
>
>
> Barry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish=
> utoronto.ca at lists.osu.edu] *On Behalf Of *Heidi G Lerner
> *Sent:* July 27, 2015 1:08 PM
> *To:* Hebrew Name Authority Funnel (heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu)
> *Subject:* [Heb-NACO] romanization question
>
>
>
> I would like some help on providing the correct romanization for
>
>
>
> כמטחווי
>
>
>
> Would it be:
>
>
>
> ki-meṭaḥaṿe
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> ki-mṭaḥaṿe
>
>
>
> Alkalay does not show a "sheva" under the Even-Shoshan does.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, Heidi
>
>
>
> --
>
> Heidi G. Lerner
> Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
> Metadata Development Unit
> Stanford University Libraries
> Stanford, CA 94305-6004
> e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu
> ph: 650-725-9953
> fax: 650-725-1120
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20150727/5c75403a/attachment-0001.html>