[Heb-NACO] Sifre kodesh-ese

[Heidi G Lerner]

Hi Robert, 

The rules for cataloging a situation such as you have are found in RDA and the accompanying LC-PC PSS 6.27.1.6. 

What we have is a an edition of the Humash accompanied by Rashi's commentary. However the resource itself is not presented as a "work" by Rashi. So, as you have correctly done, you have made the preferred title "1300 Bible. ǂp Pentateuch. ǂl Hebrew. ǂf 2012" the main entry. 

LC catalogers are also required to make an authorized access point for the commentary if it has its own title proper. In this case they would construct the access point as: 

730 02 |iContains (work):|aRashi, ǂd 1040-1105. ǂt Perush Rashi ʻal ha-Torah. 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Robert M. TALBOTT" <rtalbott at library.berkeley.edu> 
To: "Hebrew Name Authority Funnel" <heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu> 
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:26:52 AM 
Subject: [Heb-NACO] Sifre kodesh-ese 

Folks: 

I surely do wish we had a new edition of Maher. I know one's in the works, but golly, guidance is nice. 

Anyhow, I'm putting together a record a Mikraot gedolot ed. by David Holzer; publisher: Al ha-rishoim) and I've got some general questions about the finer points of performing this sort of work in the RDA environment. 

1) So, I haven't quite decided on a 130 yet (Bible. Pentateuch. Hebrew. 2012 seems fine, but see blow), but the relational terminology for the 1xx is giving me a fit. It's core to supply relation terms for creators, and I sure do like to include this sort of thing even for PFCs (persons, families, & coporate bodies, not Privates First Class) of all sorts. But is there an appropriate relational term just a regular old 130 in this instance? 

2) Formulating the 130: Like I said above, Bible. Pentateuch. Hebrew. 2012 seems fine, and it's likely what I'm going to use, but one wonders whether or not we'll be getting any recommendations for preferred formulations for this sort of thing in the new Hebraica cataloging manual. Will we be getting pointers and/or "best practices" in the new HC? If so, what might they be? 

For reference, here's my unreleased record 

050 4BS1222 ǂb .H65 2012 
049 CUYM 
1300 Bible. ǂp Pentateuch. ǂl Hebrew. ǂf 2012 
24510מקראות גדולות החוט המשולם : ǂb עם פירוש רש"י ... / ǂc הרב דוד הולצר, ראש מכון על הראשונים. 
24510Miḳraʼot gedolot ha-Ḥuṭ ha-meshulam : ǂb ʻim perush Rashi ... / ǂc ha-Rav Daṿid Holtser, rosh Mekhon ʻAl ha-Rishonim. 
2463 חוט המשולם 
2463 Ḥuṭ ha-meshulam 
264 1ירושלים : ǂb על הראשונים, ǂc [2012- ] 
264 1Yerushalayim : ǂb ʻAl ha-Rishonim, ǂc [2012- ] 
300 volumes <2> ; ǂc 28 cm 
336 text ǂ2 rdacontent 
337 unmediated ǂ2 rdamedia 
338 volume ǂ2 rdacarrier 
5051 -- [2] Shemot 
63000Bible. ǂp Pentateuch ǂv Commentaries. 
7001 הולצר, דוד. 
7001 Holzer, David ǂc (Rabbi), ǂe editor. 

Thanks in advance 

B 





-- 
Bob Talbott
Hebraica Cataloger
UC Berkeley
250 Moffitt
Berkeley, CA 94720

We're happy as fish,
as gorgeous as geese,
and wonderfully clean in the morning. 

_______________________________________________ 
Heb-naco mailing list 
Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu 
https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco 



-- 
Heidi G. Lerner 
Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica 
Metadata Development Unit 
Stanford University Libraries 
Stanford, CA 94305-6004 
e-mail: lerner at stanford.edu 
ph: 650-725-9953 
fax: 650-725-1120 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20140516/ca724e5c/attachment.html>