[Heb-NACO] assorted works by several authors

Heidi G Lerner lerner at stanford.edu
Wed Jan 8 18:23:10 EST 2014


I am not sure I understand your question. Are you asking how to code the preferred title of the work vs. the access point for the physical object (see LC-PCC PS 6.2.2.7)? 
I believe that the access point for the preferred title goes in a 130 or 100/240 if it a single work, and the heading for the physical manuscript would go in a 730 or 710. 

Safranim, if you have other ideas please contribute to the discussion. 

Thanks, Heidi 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Jay Rovner" <jarovner at jtsa.edu> 
To: "Hebrew Name Authority Funnel" <heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:57:50 PM 
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] assorted works by several authors 



Please allow me to correct my query. 

If I understand RDA correctly, RDA allows me to create/devise a 245 field however I want, without requiring me to give a 100 m.e. to the author of the first work. Au contraire , RDA prescribes a 110 field for the main entry, and lets us sort out authors in the 700 fields. נכון ? 


JR 



Jay Rovner, PhD 

Manuscript Bibliographer 

The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary 

5501 Library 

3080 Broadway 

New York City, New York 10027 

(212) 678-8045 





From: heb-naco-bounces+jarovner=jtsa.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+jarovner=jtsa.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Jay Rovner 
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:30 PM 
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel 
Subject: [Heb-NACO] assorted works by several authors 




In cataloging a ms. containing works on several topics by various authors, I got to the following rule for “devising” a title. 

c) a devised title. Use the authorized access point representing the repository (see 11.13.1 ) followed by Manuscript . Add the repository’s designation for the manuscript or manuscript group. If the manuscript is a single item within a collection, add the foliation, if known. 

EXAMPLE 

British Library. Manuscript. Arundel 384 

Yale University. Music Library. Manuscript. LM 4708 

Herzog August Bibliothek. Manuscript. Helmstedt 628, folio 185–192 



Do those examples represent the contents of a 245 field? If so, does that matter all go into subfield a even with the periods? If not, and the examples actually represent Corporate body-ms. added entries, where does one find guidance for a 245 entry? 



Thank you 




JR 



Jay Rovner, PhD 

Manuscript Bibliographer 

The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary 

5501 Library 

3080 Broadway 

New York City, New York 10027 

(212) 678-8045 





From: heb-naco-bounces+jarovner=jtsa.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [ mailto:heb-naco-bounces+jarovner=jtsa.edu at lists.service.ohio-state.edu ] On Behalf Of Heidi G Lerner 
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 10:56 AM 
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel 
Subject: [Heb-NACO] Fwd: three parts of a work 









Jay, 



The instructions in RDA are a bit confusing. RDA 6.23.10.3 tells us: 



Selections from the Talmud 

If the resource being described consists of selections, use the preferred title for the Talmud, followed by the term Selections. 

EXAMPLE 

Talmud. Selections 

Resource described: The Babylonian Talmud in selection / edited and translated from the original Hebrew and Aramaic by Leo Auerbach 

Talmud Yerushalmi. Selections 

Resource described: Der Jerusalemer Talmud : sieben ausgewälte Kapitel / übersetzt, kommentiert und eingeleitet von Hans-Jürgen Becker 



This is different than guidelines for selections from the Bible (RDA 6.23.2.9.7) where we are instructed to: 

“For other selections (including miscellaneous extracts) use the most specific title that is appropriate for the selections, followed by the term Selections.Record the specific title for the part or parts by applying these instructions, as applicable.” 



However, if we did not have that instruction we would handle your work in hand in a different way: 

Using your devised title as the title proper, we would refer to the second part of RDA 6.2.2.9 and the accompanying LC-PCC PS. 

RDA 6.2.2.9 (2 nd part) 

Unnumbered or non-consecutively numbered parts. When identifying two or more unnumbered or non-consecutively numbered parts of a work, record the preferred title for each of the parts. Apply the instructions at 6.2.2.9.1 . 



EXAMPLE 

Purgatorio 

Preferred title for a part of Dante Alighieri’s Divina commedia in a compilation also comprising the part Paradiso 

Paradiso 

Preferred title for a part of Dante Alighieri’s Divina commedia in a compilation also comprising the part Purgatorio 

Book 1 

Preferred title for a part of Homer’s Iliad in a compilation also comprising book 6 

Book 6 

Preferred title for a part of Homer’s Iliad in a compilation also comprising book 1 



Alternative 

When identifying two or more unnumbered or non-consecutively numbered parts of a work, identify the parts collectively. Record the conventional collective title Selections as the preferred title for the parts. Apply this instruction instead of or in addition to recording the preferred title for each of the parts. 



EXAMPLE 

Selections 

Preferred title for the parts of the work in a compilation comprising books 1 and 6 of Homer’s Iliad 

Selections 

Preferred title for the parts of the work in a compilation comprising four episodes of the television program The Simpsons originally broadcast between 1990 and 2001 



The LC-PCC PS provides guidelines for LC catalogers telling them to implement the Alternative. Thus in your case if you were an LC cataloger you would be required to create the preferred heading: 

Talmud Yerushalmi. Moed, Selections. This heading would go in a 130 field. 





and have the option of making 1, 2 or 3 added access points (730 field) for each of the individual, aka, 

Talmud Yerushalmi. Sukkah. Selectdions 

Talmud Yerushalmi. Rosh ha-Shanah Selections 

Talmud Yerushalmi. Moed. Selections 





I am not satisfied with the current RDA treatment of selections from the Talmud. My strong preference is that the rule be reexamined and reworded so that it allows for more specificity in identifying various parts of the Talmud. I would like to hear the thoughts of my colleagues. 





Thank you , Heidi 









From: "Jay Rovner" < jarovner at jtsa.edu > 
To: "Hebrew Name Authority Funnel" < heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 12:53:23 PM 
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] three parts of a work 





I am cataloging a manuscript for which I devised the following title. Portions of tractates Sukkah, Rosh ha-shanah and Yoma from a Yemenite Talmud codex. 

Perhaps the “different places” you allude to would affect how i choose to word the title? 


JR 



Jay Rovner, PhD 

Manuscript Bibliographer 

The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary 

5501 Library 

3080 Broadway 

New York City, New York 10027 

(212) 678-8045 





From: heb-naco-bounces at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [ mailto:heb-naco-bounces at lists.service.ohio-state.edu ] On Behalf Of Heidi G Lerner 
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:08 PM 
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel 
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] three parts of a work 





HI Jay, 

This situation is addressed in RDA in several different places, depending on the title proper of the work and how the contents are presented. If you have a specific resource that you are working on could you please describe it or provide a surrogate of the title page and anything else that might be relevant? 

Thanks, Heidi 






From: "Jay Rovner" < jarovner at jtsa.edu > 
To: "Hebrew Name Authority Funnel" < heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 10:05:21 AM 
Subject: [Heb-NACO] three parts of a work 





Is the rule of three relevant in RDA as it was in AACR2? I mean, if a work contains several Talmudic tractates from seder Moed, one would assign a uniform title: Talmud. Moed. Selections. But if a work consists of three tractates from Moed, would each one get its own separate u.t., with the first tractate getting the 130, as with AACR2; or, must the 130 field reflect the entirety of the contents, i.e., Talmud. Moed. Selections. 

If so, would each of the three tractate get its own 730? 

Thank you. 

JR 



Jay Rovner, PhD 

Manuscript Bibliographer 

The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary 

5501 Library 

3080 Broadway 

New York City, New York 10027 

(212) 678-8045 




_______________________________________________ 
Heb-naco mailing list 
Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu 
https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco 






_______________________________________________ 
Heb-naco mailing list 
Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu 
https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco 







_______________________________________________ 
Heb-naco mailing list 
Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu 
https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20140108/f2ab0a99/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 743 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20140108/f2ab0a99/attachment.png>


More information about the Heb-naco mailing list