[Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

[Jay Rovner]

It would be ve-`arakhti, no?

           JR

Jay Rovner, PhD
Manuscript Bibliographer
The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary
5501 Library
3080 Broadway
New York City, New York  10027
(212) 678-8045

From: heb-naco-bounces at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Biella, Joan
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 4:13 PM
To: 'Jasmin Nof'; heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

The whole phrase "ha-Honen le-Adam Da'at" is capped, because it is a name consisting of a phrase, sort of like "She Who Must Be Obeyed," "Father Time," or "Calamity Jane" (AACR2 rule 22.11A).

From: Jasmin Nof [mailto:jnof at upenn.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 4:11 PM
To: heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu; Biella, Joan
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

I can answer the second one more easily as it comes from the 'amidah: it's le-adam, not la-adam. (why would adam and da'at be capped?)

I'll look into the ער"ח...

Jasmin

On 9/24/2012 2:26 PM, Biella, Joan wrote:
The LCCN is 2011425612 and the title is "Shut Minḥat Avraham."

The statement of responsibility says "ḥibartiṿ ṿa-ʻarakhtiṿ be-ḥesed D. ʻalai uve-ʻezrat ha-Ḥonen la-Adam Daʻat ani ha-tsaʻir ʻer. ḥ. Avraham b.R. Saʻid Ḥamami, y. ts. ṿ."

My question:  what is ʻer. ḥ. = ער"ח?  Somehow "ʻerev rosh ḥodesh" doesn't fit the context.

Bonus question: should it be ha-Ḥonen la-Adam Daʻat or ha-Ḥonen le-Adam Daʻat?

Thank you for your collective wisdom.
Joan



_______________________________________________

Heb-naco mailing list

Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu<mailto:Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu>

https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20120925/d439e8c1/attachment.html>