[Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

[Biella, Joan]

"ḥibartiṿ ṿa-ʻarakhtiṿ be-ḥesed D. ʻalai uve-ʻezrat ha-Ḥonen la-Adam Daʻat ani ha-tsaʻir ʻer. ḥ. Avraham b.R. Saʻid Ḥamami, y. ts. ṿ."

From: heb-naco-bounces+jbie=loc.gov at lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+jbie=loc.gov at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Barry Walfish
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 6:20 PM
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

Joan,

You don’t give the sentence the abbreviation is in.

It’s definitely le-adam da’at as is written in the Amidah, “atah honen le-adam da’at…”

Barry

From: heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish=utoronto.ca at lists.service.ohio-state.edu<mailto:heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish=utoronto.ca at lists.service.ohio-state.edu> [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+barry.walfish=utoronto.ca at lists.service.ohio-state.edu] On Behalf Of Biella, Joan
Sent: September 24, 2012 2:27 PM
To: 'Hebrew Name Authority Funnel'
Subject: [Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

The LCCN is 2011425612 and the title is "Shut Minḥat Avraham."

The statement of responsibility says "ḥibartiṿ ṿa-ʻarakhtiṿ be-ḥesed D. ʻalai uve-ʻezrat ha-Ḥonen la-Adam Daʻat ani ha-tsaʻir ʻer. ḥ. Avraham b.R. Saʻid Ḥamami, y. ts. ṿ."

My question:  what is ʻer. ḥ. = ער"ח?  Somehow "ʻerev rosh ḥodesh" doesn't fit the context.

Bonus question: should it be ha-Ḥonen la-Adam Daʻat or ha-Ḥonen le-Adam Daʻat?

Thank you for your collective wisdom.
Joan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20120925/c4509e82/attachment.html>