[Heb-NACO] romanization of the day?

[Jasmin Nof]

I can answer the second one more easily as it comes from the 'amidah: 
it's le-adam, not la-adam. (why would adam and da'at be capped?)

I'll look into the ??"?...

Jasmin

On 9/24/2012 2:26 PM, Biella, Joan wrote:
>
> The LCCN is 2011425612 and the title is "Shut Minh?at Avraham."
>
> The statement of responsibility says "h?ibartiv? v?a-?arakhtiv? 
> be-h?esed D. ?alai uve-?ezrat ha-H?onen la-Adam Da?at ani ha-tsa?ir 
> ?er. h?. Avraham b.R. Sa?id H?amami, y. ts. v?."
>
> My question:  what is ?er. h?. = ??"??  Somehow "?erev rosh h?odesh" 
> doesn't fit the context.
>
> Bonus question: should it be ha-H?onen la-Adam Da?at or ha-H?onen 
> le-Adam Da?at?
>
> Thank you for your collective wisdom.
>
> Joan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco at lists.service.ohio-state.edu
> https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/heb-naco/attachments/20120924/d52df03a/attachment.html>