<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>I’m surprised this article is being discussed again after all those
years.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>See some responses:</DIV>
<DIV><A
title=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/aug/24/featuresreviews.guardianreview9
href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/aug/24/featuresreviews.guardianreview9">https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/aug/24/featuresreviews.guardianreview9</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Mark reviewed the book in which the article was reprinted: see “Woolf
Studies Annual”, Vol. XIII (2007), 208-12.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Oddities: aren’t his book or books on the Raj well thought-of? why
chose a pseudonym? because he was a doctor?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"Theodore Dalrymple is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute [“a
conservative think tank”, said Mark] and a contributing editor of 'City
Journal'. He is a retired physician who, most recently, practiced in a British
inner-city hospital and prison. Dalrymple has written a column for 'The
Spectator' (London) for many years ..."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Why chose a pseudonym that emphasises his relationship to Woolf? Or
did he want to emphasise his relationship to the Raj?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>His great-great-grandmother was Sophia Pattle.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Stuart</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>