<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    This is a banal piece, which only confirms my opinion of Cunningham.
    I intensely disliked <i>The Hours</i> and was bewildered by its
    popularity with critics and readers.<br>
    Jean Mallinson<i><br>
    </i>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/18/2013 4:52 AM, Christine Froula
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:51E7D6F9.107@northwestern.edu" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      That's indeed "more than enough out of [Cunningham]." Not worthy
      of the Guardian either, I'd have thought. <br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/18/2013 5:46 AM, Gregory Jordan
        Dekter wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+-Q8AOtdcq_0UXBWQywM0cAUPy=5zumw6OGjk7ZoqukYZRWTQ@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=ISO-8859-1">
        <div>From The Guardian Books Blog, July 16: <a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2013/jul/16/michael-cunningham-folio-joyce-woolf">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2013/jul/16/michael-cunningham-folio-joyce-woolf</a></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Forgetting the cliched gender analogy, this article isn't
          doing Woolf or Joyce any favours. Cunningham seems overly
          focused on personal traits which 1) he doesn't even support
          and 2) he twists the meaning of to be sensational. What about
          facilitating a discussion on the importance of these works,
          instead of baseless (and ultimately uninteresting) claims
          about their authors? </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Also: "Woolf, in To the Lighthouse, is Winnicott's
          good-enough mother, the one who's able to love her children
          while simultaneously urging them towards lives of their own,
          beyond her reach or influence." Does Cunningham think Woolf
          and Mrs Ramsay are the same? Certainly he knows that an
          author, narrator, and character are all completely different
          things? But then, what could he mean by this?</div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <br>
        <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Vwoolf mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Vwoolf@lists.service.ohio-state.edu">Vwoolf@lists.service.ohio-state.edu</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwoolf">https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwoolf</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Vwoolf mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Vwoolf@lists.service.ohio-state.edu">Vwoolf@lists.service.ohio-state.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwoolf">https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwoolf</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>