<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>More on this:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><a href="http://jezebel.com/why-are-we-so-fascinated-with-female-suicides-514393082">http://jezebel.com/why-are-we-so-fascinated-with-female-suicides-514393082</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> vwoolf-bounces@lists.service.ohio-state.edu [mailto:vwoolf-bounces@lists.service.ohio-state.edu] <b>On Behalf Of </b>William Bain<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:49 AM<br><b>To:</b> vwoolf@lists.service.ohio-state.edu<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Vwoolf] staging female author suicides<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>This thought provoking discussion has made me think<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:black'>a lot about Virginia Woolf's own work and her ideas<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>on similar themes. There is, obviously, her remarkable<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>openness, passages where she speaks of a desire for<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>a very widely inclusive art. Certainly art (a polysemous<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>word) us open to criticism (another), and I agree with<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>much of what's being said here. At the same time being<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>somewhat astounded as to the length of the discussion.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>At the end of the day I think of Virginia Woolf's own<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>artistic devices, things like the opening of _Orlando_.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>This is not to compare the book with the _Vice_ send-up,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>or at least not to suggest they're on much equal footing.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>I think it does bring home Woolf's stranging devices. And<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>it perhaps suggests a difference in technique between<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>visual and written. Thanks for the discussion,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:black'>Best wishes, wb<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></body></html>