[Ohiogift] Discretion and Disproportiona

[Eric C Calvert]

Another argument in favor of whole grade screening vs. assessment for gifted identification by referral only.

From: Ohiogift <ohiogift-bounces+eric.calvert=northwestern.edu at lists.osu.edu<mailto:ohiogift-bounces+eric.calvert=northwestern.edu at lists.osu.edu>> on behalf of Art Snyder via Ohiogift <ohiogift at lists.osu.edu<mailto:ohiogift at lists.osu.edu>>
Reply-To: "margaretdelacy at comcast.net<mailto:margaretdelacy at comcast.net>" <margaretdelacy at comcast.net<mailto:margaretdelacy at comcast.net>>
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:35 PM
To: List for OATAG <oatag at yahoogroups.com<mailto:oatag at yahoogroups.com>>, XL-PDX <xl-pdx at yahoogroups.com<mailto:xl-pdx at yahoogroups.com>>, TAGFAM <TAGFAM at LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG<mailto:TAGFAM at LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG>>, Ohiogift <Ohiogift at lists.service.ohio-state.edu<mailto:Ohiogift at lists.service.ohio-state.edu>>
Subject: [Ohiogift] Discretion and Disproportiona

Friends:

Below is a link to an interesting research study that appeared in AERA Open this month concerning the role of teacher race and bureaucratic discretion in the assignment of students to gifted programs:

http://ero.sagepub.com/content/2/1/2332858415622175

Discretion and Disproportionality
Explaining the Underrepresentation of High-Achieving Students of Color in Gifted Programs
Jason A. Grissom, Christopher Redding
DOI: 10.1177/2332858415622175, Jan 2016
Margaret
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osu.edu/pipermail/ohiogift/attachments/20160127/855115d0/attachment.html>