[mvapich-discuss] Problem Building MVAPICH-1.0-beta with PGI
Compilers
Peter Cebull
peter.cebull at inl.gov
Fri Feb 8 15:47:15 EST 2008
Weikuan Yu wrote:
>
> Could you please confirm the version number? is it mvapich-0.9.9 or
> the latest mvapich-1.0.0 from a nightly tarball?
>
I've tried the Feb 5th tarball from
http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu/nightly/mvapich/branches/0.9.9, and
the MVAPICH 1.0 beta dated 10/26/07:
http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu/download/mvapich/mvapich-1.0-beta.tar.gz.
I'm starting to wonder if the build might be picking up the wrong header
files. We have some header files in /usr/include (mpif.h, mpi.h, etc.),
I guess from SGI's MPT. Maybe they're causing problems.
Peter
>
> Peter Cebull wrote:
>> Jonathan L. Perkins wrote:
>>>
>>> Just another suggestion. Can you try MVAPICH from our trunk and/or
>>> mvapich2 to see if you encounter the same issue? Is there an older
>>> version of MVAPICH that you got to work with the same configuration?
>>>
>> I tried mvapich-0.9.9-2008-02-05 with no luck. MVAPICH2 seemed to
>> build okay. I've never built MVAPICH before -- our new system (SGI
>> Altix ICE) came with gcc and Intel versions of mvapich 0.9.9, I'm
>> just trying to build an equivalent configuration for the PGI compilers.
>>
>> It seems to be a problem finding include files. If I cd into
>> romio/mpi-io and try to compile close.c, it fails. I copied the
>> entire source tree to my desktop (OpenSUSE 10.1 and the same PGI
>> compilers) and close.c compiled with no problem. Back on the other
>> system if I copied the header files from the include directory into
>> romio/mpi-io, then I could compile close.c.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
--
Peter Cebull
HPC User Consultant
Idaho National Laboratory
P.O. Box 1625, MS3605
Idaho Falls, ID 83415
Phone: 208-526-1909
Email: Peter.Cebull at inl.gov
More information about the mvapich-discuss
mailing list