[mvapich-discuss] Perhaps small bug/fix found for mvapich-1.0-beta

[Alexei I. Adamovich]

Hi!

Seems, I've found a small cut-an-paste-style inexactness in
mpid/ch_gen2_us/mv_buf.c (in get_rbuf_size), see diff/patch in attachement.

Is this one known already?

Sincerely,
Alexei I. Adamovich
-------------- next part --------------
--- mpid/ch_gen2_ud/mv_buf.c	2007-10-26 23:50:29.000000000 +0400
+++ /tmp/mv_buf.c	2007-12-11 16:06:46.000000000 +0300
@@ -100,31 +100,31 @@
 static inline mv_rbuf_size * get_rbuf_size(int rbuf_size) {
     int found = 0, i; 
     mv_rbuf_size * b;
 
     for(i = 0; i < mv_rbuf_avail_num; i++) {
         if(mv_rbuf_avail[i].alloc_size == rbuf_size) {
             found = 1;
             b = &(mv_rbuf_avail[i]);
             break;  
         }       
     }
 
     if(!found) {
         /* TODO: re-order based on size!!! */
 
-        b = &(mv_rbuf_avail[mv_sbuf_avail_num]);
+        b = &(mv_rbuf_avail[mv_rbuf_avail_num]);
 
         b->alloc_size = rbuf_size;
         /* TODO: change if using headers */
         b->max_data_size = rbuf_size;
         b->head = NULL; 
 
         mv_rbuf_avail_num++;
 
         D_PRINT("creating new rbuf size: %d\n",  rbuf_size);
     }
 
     return b;
 }