<div dir="ltr">Thanks for your response Aaron.<div><br></div><div>What we're lacking are clear, applicable examples in the HCM. Personally, I just don't care what the final answer is, but I think it's very important that we're all on the same page in the end. The only way to achieve that would be to have clear answers with examples in the HCM.</div><div><br></div><div>Until we get a new edition of the HCM, I suggest tolerating answers to the 264#1 form-of-date dilemma you might not agree with. It's important that we resolve it, but we should also keep in mind that in the larger scheme of things, the form of the date, so long as the date itself is correct, is less important than other elements of the bib record.</div><div><br></div><div>Heidi: Perhaps this is one of those areas where we could have a temporary, work-around rule</div><div><br></div><div>B</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Taub, Aaron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:atau@loc.gov" target="_blank">atau@loc.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Jasmin,<br>
<br>
Apologies for my late response.<br>
<br>
Regarding point C in your message below, I only put "that is" if the Hebrew publishing date is also inferred and is itself in brackets. If the Hebrew publishing date is clearly given and unbracketed, I then put the Gregorian calendar in brackets WITHOUT "that is." Is that incorrect? Your point C seems to suggest that it is.<br>
<br>
775 [2015]<br>
<br>
[775, that is, 2015] for when pub. date is inferred<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
A<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Heb-naco [mailto:<a href="mailto:heb-naco-bounces%2Batau">heb-naco-bounces+atau</a>=<a href="mailto:loc.gov@lists.osu.edu"><wbr>loc.gov@lists.osu.edu</a>] On Behalf Of Shinohara, Jasmin<br>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 3:13 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:rtalbott@library.berkeley.edu">rtalbott@library.berkeley.edu</a>; Hebrew Name Authority Funnel<br>
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] 264 bracketed dates: = or that is?<br>
<br>
1. You write below "present on the t.p. verso" and "present on the publication"; remember that both are equivalent in terms of RDA. The entire body of work is considered the "preferred source of information" (formerly, "chief source of information", or "csi"). Where equivalent data appears in both vernacular and Roman forms, the "=" is used to show the two "parallel" forms.<br>
<br>
2. Unless a work _specifically_ indicates a publication dates, the dates in the 264 are bracketed. Hence, anywhere you have either a _copyright_ or a _printing_ date, it will be in brackets.<br>
<br>
Putting 1. and 2. together:<br>
<br>
A. If the resource gives a date anywhere in the publication in _both_ the Hebrew and the Gregorian forms, the 264 would give both, using the = to indicate both are present.<br>
B. If the date is something other than a publication date and appears in _both_ the Hebrew and the Gregorian forms, it will appear as [Heb. = Greg.].<br>
C. If a publication date is ONLY given in the Heb., the Heb. form will appear without brackets and "that is" will be added to give the inferred Greg. date inside brackets.<br>
D. If a publication date is ONLY given in the Heb., BUT there is another form of the date in the Greg. OR a more detailed Heb. date appears elsewhere in the source, the Heb. form will appear without brackets and the inferred Greg. date will be given in brackets, without either "=" or "that is" because the data is neither equivalent nor inferred.<br>
<br>
Capiche? Others, did I miss anything?<br>
<br>
Jasmin<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Heb-naco [mailto:<a href="mailto:heb-naco-bounces@lists.osu.edu">heb-naco-bounces@<wbr>lists.osu.edu</a>] On Behalf Of Robert M. TALBOTT<br>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 2:04 PM<br>
To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel<br>
Subject: [Heb-NACO] 264 bracketed dates: = or that is?<br>
<br>
Folks:<br>
<br>
I've been seeing an awful lot of bracketed dates utilizing the equals<br>
(=) sign, to wit:<br>
<br>
where only a copyright of 774 and a copyright of 2014 are present on the t.p. verso<br>
<br>
$c [774 = 2014]<br>
<br>
As I read the HCM (2.8.6, pp. 47-48), it appears that the equals sign is only used in instances where there are two firm dates that are unbracketed. Again, as I understand it, inside brackets, the phrase "that is" is used.<br>
<br>
where only a copyright of 774 and a copyright of 2014 are present on the publication<br>
<br>
$c [774, that is, 2014]<br>
<br>
Am I wrong? Have things changed?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Bob<br>
--<br>
Bob Talbott<br>
<br>
Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger<br>
<br>
UC Berkeley<br>
<br>
250 Moffitt<br>
<br>
Berkeley, CA 94720<br>
<br>
I'm just mad about Saffron<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Heb-naco mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu">Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/heb-naco</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Heb-naco mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu">Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/heb-naco</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Bob Talbott<br><br>Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger<br><br>UC Berkeley<br><br>250 Moffitt<br><br>Berkeley, CA 94720<br><br>I'm just mad about Saffron</div>
</div>